I've read the reviews too. But I sure don't see what they're talking
about.


"KenV" <kvatz@mindsnospampring.com> wrote in message
news:%23eoCSKBEGHA.3904@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>
> "Dave" <funinatl@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:M4ednchhUrP1ViTeRVn-pg@comcast.com...
>> Well, I like Ghost 10 better than Ghost 9. It's been more stable for me.
>> But I think you can find it much cheaper than that. I've seen it from
>> free to $10 after rebates.
>>
>
> Dave, so far I can´t find it that cheaply.
>
> But I did look on Amazon, and the customer reviews of 10.0 are pretty
> scary--from major problems with installation to bad crashes during
> operation, and especially a huge slowdown in computer performance while it
> is running. Some of the reviewers say they have stayed with Ghost 2003
> which I think was the version before Symantec took it over. Obviously we
> don't know what kinds of systems the reviewers are using, or if they know
> what they're doing.
>
> For now, I think I'll stick with 9.0 since it seems to work reliably, even
> if it does slow things down a bit.
>
> Ken
>