Re: Norton Ghost 2003, Win XP Pro SP2 and Missing Operating System
Anna wrote:
> "bxf" <bill@topman.net> wrote in message
> news:1135773756.561068.312520@o13g2000cwo.googlegr oups.com...
> > Are you able to look and post here the contents of C:\boot.ini?
> > Depending on the present contents, it may be necessary to edit it so
> > that booting takes place from the appropriate OS files, rather than
> > Ghost's Virtual Partition.
> >
> > I can't refuse an opportunity to repeat my claim that Ghost 2003 is
> > often a source of great headaches - at laest when used with USB devices
> > (are you there, Anne?) Do yourself a favour and try out Acronis True
> > Image.
>
>
> Hi Bill:
> I guess you're referring to me Bill. First of all, with respect to the OP's
> problem, God knows what he's been doing as it relates to his problem.
>
> Bill, I know you're probably tired and even possibly annoyed, of again
> seeing my positive comments re using the Ghost 2003 program ...
Not even a little bit.
(...snip...)
> I understand that for one reason or another you feel strongly about the
> inadequacy of this program, and of course I'm not attempting to change your
> mind about it. All I can do is simply relate to you and others my experience
> with the program.
> Anna
Hi anna,
Apologies for not remembering your name correctly.
Let me assure you that my reference to you was made in jest. If I sound
as if I'm upset about your frequent favourable references to Ghost
2003, I assure you that I'm not. I accept what you say in that it has
been fulfilling its purpose for you. As I've mentioned in the past,
when it comes to USB devices this product can be a real pain, and I
take this post as being just another example.
Please do not take my post too seriously. At most, you can take it as
"see? I told you so", but all in good fun. Nothing harsh intended here.
Bill
|