If you could do this it would significantly add to the rendering time plus
potentially cause rendering glitches (especially with the audio portion)
-Wojo

"Stewart Berman" <sabmsdn@saberman.com> wrote in message
news:egigk116dug2pdravdud2dengo5m41mtbv@4ax.com...
> If it was just CPU heavy it won't be bad -- lower the priority and other
> things would run. But it
> does worse than that -- it doesn't let go so nothing else gets dispatched.
> (I run Nero on the same
> machine and it allows other tasks to get dispatched. You don't even
> notice it is running.)
>
> I am running Windows XP Pro SP2. Isn't there someway to set the cpu
> slices so one poorly written
> task can't take over the machine?
>
>
> "PapaJohn \(MVP\)" <PapaJohn@CharterMI.net> wrote:
>
>>no, it uses whatever CPU cycles are available...
>