I'm glad the problem is gone.
The interlace vs. non interlace issue was one that was most prevalent at the
800x600 resolution and analog monitors of old design or limited screen size.
A 10" monitor falls into one and possibly both. Another possible issue had
to do with the video card output signals and timing. I'm not sure how to
explain this, but some displays can "talk" digitally to the video card and
it's drivers. This can cause the video card to setup/tweak timing to match
the display. If an incompatable timing was setup, this might explain some
of your problems and results. If the display uses an older setup scheme,
such as an .inf file, the tweaking is generally done within it.


"emil_lam" <Emil_Lam@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:1133515237.003354.301890@g43g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
> But I've no idea of how to change the interlace setting unless the
> video cards do it automatically for me.
>
> Anyway, after changing the resolution, more icons & window content
> could be displayed on screen compared with 640x480. Image was clear &
> I'm happy with that.
>