Thread: wmf
View Single Post
  #6  
Old 01-05-2006, 03:59 PM
Heirloom
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: wmf

This may be of interest to those of you concerned:
Information provided by http://blog.ziffdavis.com/seltzer/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have an update to the anti-virus detection stats for WMF variants. There's
both good news and not so good news in it.



AV-Test tested 206 variants and the following products detected all 206:



a.. Avast!
b.. BitDefender
c.. ClamAV
d.. eSafe
e.. eTrust-VET
f.. eTrust-VET (BETA)
g.. F-Secure
h.. F-Secure (BETA)
i.. Kaspersky
j.. McAfee
k.. McAfee (BETA)
l.. Nod32
m.. OneCare
n.. Panda (BETA)
o.. Sophos
p.. Symantec
q.. Symantec (BETA)


Unfortunately some, including some well-known ones, missed quite a few.
These are the products that missed some and the number they missed:



a.. Fortinet 18
b.. Fortinet (BETA) 18
c.. AntiVir 24
d.. eTrust-INO 25
e.. eTrust-INO (BETA) 25
f.. Panda 25
g.. Ikarus 26
h.. Norman 26
i.. Ewido 47
j.. AVG 59
k.. Trend Micro (BETA) 60
l.. VirusBuster 61
m.. QuickHeal 63
n.. Trend Micro 63
o.. Dr Web 93
p.. VBA32 110
q.. Command 119
r.. F-Prot 119
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Heirloom, old and semi-safe



"David Candy" <.> wrote in message
news:OTqzsmgEGHA.2912@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
To all of you generally.

There are two types of WMF file (I once wrote a program to convert).

<snip>


Reply With Quote