|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
No way. <G>
"Robert Aldwinckle" <robald@techemail.com> wrote in message news:uR4Qxs7DGHA.2040@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... > "Steve Cochran" <scochran@oehelp.com> wrote in message > news:%23Q1iJx6DGHA.3856@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl > ... >>>> If you had to pay per email, as one does with snail mail, then it would >>>> significantly reduce the crap out there. > > > Agreed, provided there was no analog to deliveries being made with > "postage due". <eg> > > >> I'm not talking per KB. I'm talking like a postage stamp for each email >> message (you could grade it via KB size <EG>) you send. > > > More importantly it puts the costs on the sender instead of the receiver. > That's why there's so much spam--it doesn't cost the sender anything > to send one. At least with junk mail they have to consider to costs of > printing and distributing before starting an advertising campaign. > > > Robert > --- > > |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Why is this message rule grayed out? | Don | Outlook Express | 12 | 01-05-2006 04:52 PM |
| Unable to Download Email | mcp6453 | Outlook Express | 3 | 01-05-2006 04:45 PM |
| Outlook Express Gives a Negative (-) message number count | HELP | Outlook Express | 4 | 01-05-2006 04:41 PM |
| Windows XP Popup message | Alan T | Windows XP Security Admin | 11 | 01-05-2006 03:59 PM |
| Windows error message | Glo | Windows XP Basics | 41 | 01-05-2006 02:04 AM |