|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Like a lot of people, Santa brought me an MP3 player this year. When I go
into Media Player and want to rip files, I notice not only that there are 4 choices (WMA, variable bit, lossless, MP3) but that each one has a slider allowing you to modify size vs. quality. I tried one song using the standard WMA setting. It synched at about 5MB. Sound quality was OK but seemed a little tinny if you ask me. Has anybody done this math already and figured out which of these settings is best to use? I want as many songs as I can get on this thing (it's only 512MB) but I'm willing to give up *some* space for quality. Thoughts? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
In news:BE14D9FA-C520-4F7A-9E0C-2A70EBC9A486@microsoft.com,
jpas1954 <jpas1954@discussions.microsoft.com> had this to say: My reply is at the bottom of your sent message: > Like a lot of people, Santa brought me an MP3 player this year. When > I go into Media Player and want to rip files, I notice not only that > there are 4 choices (WMA, variable bit, lossless, MP3) but that each > one has a slider allowing you to modify size vs. quality. I tried one > song using the standard WMA setting. It synched at about 5MB. Sound > quality was OK but seemed a little tinny if you ask me. Has anybody > done this math already and figured out which of these settings is > best to use? I want as many songs as I can get on this thing (it's > only 512MB) but I'm willing to give up *some* space for quality. > Thoughts? At about 192 kbps you're at about the best the average human ear is able to detect any nuances. Optionally, see if you can convert a switch and play your music out of speakers instead of your ear buds or what have you? Do you notice a difference? If so then consider upgrading to a fair quality (under $100 should get you a decent pair) headphones. My experiences with ripping from WMP is pretty limited and I tend to use a third party application for ripping though I do all of my playback from within WMP. Then again I rip at 320 kbps here on to the drive and if I'm going to convert it for my media player than I just go ahead and compress it down to 128 which is... "good enough..." The "tinny" sound (which is a real musical term meaning thin in tone) that you're getting is very likely not due to the quality of the rip but rather to the quality of the equipment. -- Galen - MS MVP - Windows (Shell/User & IE) http://dts-l.org/ "We approached the case, you remember, with an absolutely blank mind, which is always an advantage. We had formed no theories. We were simply there to observe and to draw inferences from our observations." - Sherlock Holmes |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 05:31:02 -0800, "jpas1954"
<jpas1954@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: >Like a lot of people, Santa brought me an MP3 player this year. When I go >into Media Player and want to rip files, I notice not only that there are 4 >choices (WMA, variable bit, lossless, MP3) but that each one has a slider >allowing you to modify size vs. quality. I tried one song using the standard >WMA setting. It synched at about 5MB. Sound quality was OK but seemed a >little tinny if you ask me. Has anybody done this math already and figured >out which of these settings is best to use? I want as many songs as I can get >on this thing (it's only 512MB) but I'm willing to give up *some* space for >quality. Thoughts? I'd use 64kbps for a 512MB player. But then I listen in noisy environments (like my car, which is old and particularly noisy) and the streets near us (which are full of old, noisy cars like mine). I guess it depends how sensitive you are to the 'quality' given your listening environment. I'd just use 64 or maybe 96kbps at a push - what's right for you depends on how good you want it ot be vs how many tracks you want to get in the MP3 player - it's a tradeoff. Maybe headphones other than the cheap ones provided by the player manufacturer would be a good investment (though good ones will easily cost more than the player itself did !) Cheers - Neil |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ah. Another variable, the headphones. Of course. So, taking all this into
consideration, I used WMA files set to 192k. I swapped in some better headphones and that made all the difference. Well, most of it. Turns out the device also has a nice equalizer so I'd say it sounds pretty good now. Thanks. "jpas1954" wrote: > Like a lot of people, Santa brought me an MP3 player this year. When I go > into Media Player and want to rip files, I notice not only that there are 4 > choices (WMA, variable bit, lossless, MP3) but that each one has a slider > allowing you to modify size vs. quality. I tried one song using the standard > WMA setting. It synched at about 5MB. Sound quality was OK but seemed a > little tinny if you ask me. Has anybody done this math already and figured > out which of these settings is best to use? I want as many songs as I can get > on this thing (it's only 512MB) but I'm willing to give up *some* space for > quality. Thoughts? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Big Size Font appears in Printouts | Mahendra raj, Coimbatore | Outlook Express | 1 | 01-05-2006 05:00 PM |
| Persistent incorrect default paper size | Garam Chitti | Internet Explorer 6 | 0 | 01-05-2006 04:35 PM |
| PLZ Help me have prombles with directX and Ddraw Files.. | StEvEn_need-HELP | Windows XP Games | 1 | 01-05-2006 07:55 AM |
| RE: Remote control and color quality | Daniel Gurney | Windows XP Work Remotely | 1 | 01-05-2006 07:12 AM |
| 2 shortcut questions | SeaMaid | Windows XP Customize | 11 | 01-05-2006 06:30 AM |