|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi all,
I have WinXP workstations on remote branches that connect to the only WSUS server by slow links (64Kbits/s). We configured XP workstations to restrict the available bandwitdh by configuring BITS, restricting them to 10Kbits/s. It was done by using gpedit. Anyway today morning when all the PCs where connected on, the link to the branch became saturated anyway. My question is the following: Suppouse I have 6 PCs on a remote branch with 64K link. Each PC has configured BITS to 10K max. If all they begin to download security patches at the same time from WSUS, wich is the max bandwidth that WSUS uses in total? 10Kb for all the PCs or 10Kb for each one resulting 60Kb of total WSUS usage? The question arises from the fact that when configuring BITS policies on a PC, it is done on a PC basis, there is no knowledge of the network topology. How much intelligent is BITS? Thanks in advance Sammy |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
BITS is not aware of the link between the offices. BITS can only say that
it will use up to "X"Kb set in the policy. With that being said and if these workstations are being turned off/on daily, then what you describe is expected as a 17-22 hour would have passed and they will start checking in right near startup. In this particular case, is it possible to leave the workstations on but logged off during the night? If the answer here is yes, the site could set a policy to 0 for work hours and then use the 10Kb during the offshift hours. /neo "SammyBar" <sammybar@gmail.com> wrote in message news:ewuPbN39FHA.2812@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > Hi all, > > I have WinXP workstations on remote branches that connect to the only WSUS > server by slow links (64Kbits/s). We configured XP workstations to > restrict the available bandwitdh by configuring BITS, restricting them to > 10Kbits/s. It was done by using gpedit. Anyway today morning when all the > PCs where connected on, the link to the branch became saturated anyway. > My question is the following: Suppouse I have 6 PCs on a remote branch > with 64K link. Each PC has configured BITS to 10K max. If all they begin > to download security patches at the same time from WSUS, wich is the max > bandwidth that WSUS uses in total? 10Kb for all the PCs or 10Kb for each > one resulting 60Kb of total WSUS usage? > > The question arises from the fact that when configuring BITS policies on a > PC, it is done on a PC basis, there is no knowledge of the network > topology. How much intelligent is BITS? > > Thanks in advance > Sammy > > > |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"neo [mvp outlook]" <neo@online.mvps.org> escribió en el mensaje news:%23$MtVl59FHA.904@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > BITS is not aware of the link between the offices. BITS can only say that > it will use up to "X"Kb set in the policy. With that being said and if > these workstations are being turned off/on daily, then what you describe > is > expected as a 17-22 hour would have passed and they will start checking in > right near startup. In this particular case, is it possible to leave the > workstations on but logged off during the night? The answer is not. Our branches normally get electricity shut off after working hours. Our idea is to allow a minimum bandwidth to WSUS on working hours to allow updates. Our crisis comes from the fact that now we are changing OS on the branches from Win98 to XP. Our tech team uses XP SP2 CD for the installation but how to update these PCs to latest patches? We tried two approaches: Directly from the Internet Windows Update site does not works because the branches gain access to the internet through the same 64K access line. Then we decided to use WSUS with the BITS service on. Then we had similar troubles configuring maximum BITS pandwidth to 10K on each PC. So I deduce we should configure bandwidth to 10Kbs / 6 PCs in order to allow a peak usage of 10Kbs when all the PCs are updating at the same time. Anyway the best solution would be Microsoft allowed to download all security patches to one CD and apply them offline after installing the operating system. Then configure PCs for WSUS to download monthly updates. But I can't find how to collect all security patches on a CD for offline installation. It is a must. If anybody knows how to do that, please tell me Thanks for your hints Sammy |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"SammyBar" <sammybar@gmail.com> wrote in message news:ewuPbN39FHA.2812@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > My question is the following: Suppouse I have 6 PCs on a remote branch with > 64K link. Each PC has configured BITS to 10K max. If all they begin to > download security patches at the same time from WSUS, wich is the max > bandwidth that WSUS uses in total? 10Kb for all the PCs or 10Kb for each one > resulting 60Kb of total WSUS usage? Each PC will use the 10kb you have configured for that PC, which will result in an aggregate usage of 60kb/sec. Note also that 64kb/sec is the /theoretical/ throughput of that WAN link. The actual throughput will be about 80% of that, at best, so ... yeah ... 6 PC at 10kb/sec all downloading simutaneously will saturate the link, most likely. > The question arises from the fact that when configuring BITS policies on a > PC, it is done on a PC basis, there is no knowledge of the network topology. > How much intelligent is BITS? Neo's explanation is the answer to this. The key to succeeding with the 10kb/sec limitation is to make sure those six PCs are rotating their detections around the clock. The only way to do this is to leave them powered on, at least, through the work week. > Thanks in advance > Sammy > > > |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Update for Background Intelligent Transfer Service (BITS) 2.0 and | taylor | Windows Update | 1 | 01-05-2006 05:18 PM |
| Update installation fails | Harold Cataquet | Windows Update | 23 | 01-05-2006 05:17 PM |
| Really persistent BITS belly up | Goldnsteel | Windows Update | 3 | 01-05-2006 05:07 PM |
| Re: BITS Error 2147942402 (0x80070002) | gynee | Windows Update | 0 | 01-05-2006 05:02 PM |
| BITS Error | Frank | Windows XP Help and Support | 0 | 01-05-2006 02:44 AM |