|
#1
01-05-2006, 05:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Are both .Net Framework 1.1 & 2.0 needed?
I installed 2.0 and then uninstalled 1.1.
Now I'm getting 1.1 as a recommended download on Windows Update. Is it necessary? Thanks. 
|
|
#2
01-05-2006, 05:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Are both .Net Framework 1.1 & 2.0 needed?
To maintain backwards compatibility you should have .NET Framework 1.0, 1.1,
and 2.0 (with updates) installed. "Anton Philidor" <AntonPhilidor@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:8B9AC3C6-C599-4CFE-8BF1-5C4E6E619B88@microsoft.com... >I installed 2.0 and then uninstalled 1.1. > Now I'm getting 1.1 as a recommended download on Windows Update. > > Is it necessary? Thanks.
|
|
#3
01-05-2006, 05:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Are both .Net Framework 1.1 & 2.0 needed?
Just to confirm that I understand, there's software that will run with 1.1
but not with 2.0(?). And other software that will run only with 1.0(?). Let's hope that no one with a dial-up connection needs the .Net framework. "Jerry" wrote: > To maintain backwards compatibility you should have .NET Framework 1.0, 1.1, > and 2.0 (with updates) installed. > > "Anton Philidor" <AntonPhilidor@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:8B9AC3C6-C599-4CFE-8BF1-5C4E6E619B88@microsoft.com... > >I installed 2.0 and then uninstalled 1.1. > > Now I'm getting 1.1 as a recommended download on Windows Update. > > > > Is it necessary? Thanks. > > >
|
|
#4
01-05-2006, 05:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Are both .Net Framework 1.1 & 2.0 needed?
Yes, programs written with 1.0 or 1.1 cannot be run with 2.0; same as 1.1
will not run 1.0. "Anton Philidor" <AntonPhilidor@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:1C756170-7475-4ACC-A805-B5B01C489F97@microsoft.com... > Just to confirm that I understand, there's software that will run with 1.1 > but not with 2.0(?). And other software that will run only with 1.0(?). > > Let's hope that no one with a dial-up connection needs the .Net framework. > > > > "Jerry" wrote: > >> To maintain backwards compatibility you should have .NET Framework 1.0, >> 1.1, >> and 2.0 (with updates) installed. >> >> "Anton Philidor" <AntonPhilidor@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in >> message >> news:8B9AC3C6-C599-4CFE-8BF1-5C4E6E619B88@microsoft.com... >> >I installed 2.0 and then uninstalled 1.1. >> > Now I'm getting 1.1 as a recommended download on Windows Update. >> > >> > Is it necessary? Thanks. >> >> >>
|
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Updates Were Unable To Install Successfully | Kimma | Windows Update | 8 | 01-05-2006 05:14 PM |
| How to fix .NET Framework installation failure(KB886903) per Micro | MD-11 Driver | Windows Update | 0 | 01-05-2006 05:10 PM |
| RE: One Solution to .NET Framework Service Pack Install Errors | Darkw0lf | Windows Update | 0 | 01-05-2006 05:09 PM |
| RE: .NET 1.1 Installation Failure - error 0x66A | Dave | Windows Update | 0 | 01-05-2006 05:08 PM |
| Re: Microsoft .NET Framework | Lawrence Garvin [MVP] | Windows Update | 0 | 01-05-2006 05:01 PM |
Linear Mode
