|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi everyone!
I'm not a computer newbie, but I am new to this issue and could use some assistance. I just upgraded my computer's memory (PC 3200 DDR 400). I now have 1.5 gigs or so, as in 1 x 512 mg no name and 1 x 1 GB Kingmax brand in a Pentium 4 @ 3 GHz running XP SP2 Everything seems to be running fine in that the system recognizes the memory and performance is good. Odd thing is when I run a nifty program I have called Check It Diagnostics, specifically the memory test portion of it... I get the following error message in the report: "Memory Test Optimizing Test Memory Size... ----> Memory Allocation Failed! ----> Test Failed Found Error(s)" Anyone have any idea what they're going on about? Also does anyone have insights on that whole Virtual Memory thing? How should it be set in a system like mine (80 GB hard drive with a 200 GB drive on USB) Thanks again for any input! Carmen |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Carmen,
Here's a site that describes virtual memory pretty well, maybe it'll give you some insites: http://aumha.org/a/xpvm.htm Re: your CheckIt message--hard to say. Can you get any extended information from the program? (I'm not familiar with the program.) >From the way it's worded, it could either be a memory problem, or an inability of the program to test the memory (internal error, perhaps). So, two things come to mind: 1) CheckIt is having problems doing the test [too much memory to test?] 2) you've got faulty memory sticks You might try testing the sticks one-by-one to see if that makes any difference. I.e., pull one out, start computer, run CheckIt. Repeat with other stick. If *no* errors come up, then it's probably a problem with CheckIt itself. If you get an with one or the other stick, but not both, then you've found the trouble. If *both* fail, then your back at square one. Hope this helps for a start, Walter Gildersleeve Freiburg, Germany __________________________________________________ ____ http://linkfrog.net URL Shortening Free and easy, small and green. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
With pc 3200 memory,or any memory on newer boards,you should have
both memory sticks the same size,if diffrent sizes-mb are used then configure two in slot 1 and 3,and other in 2 and 4,if diffrent are to be used.Some boards wont even run if the 2 are diffrent.However,to test memory,test it in DOS,if it works as the test results display,quit worrying about it.To test download tester at:http:www.oca.microsoft.com/en/windiag.asp "Carmen Gauvin-O'Donnell" wrote: > Hi everyone! > > I'm not a computer newbie, but I am new to this issue and could use some > assistance. > > I just upgraded my computer's memory (PC 3200 DDR 400). I now have 1.5 gigs > or so, as in 1 x 512 mg no name and 1 x 1 GB Kingmax brand in a Pentium 4 @ > 3 GHz running XP SP2 > > Everything seems to be running fine in that the system recognizes the memory > and performance is good. > > Odd thing is when I run a nifty program I have called Check It Diagnostics, > specifically the memory test portion of it... I get the following error > message in the report: > > "Memory Test > Optimizing Test Memory Size... > ----> Memory Allocation Failed! > ----> Test Failed > > Found Error(s)" > > Anyone have any idea what they're going on about? > > Also does anyone have insights on that whole Virtual Memory thing? How > should it be set in a system like mine (80 GB hard drive with a 200 GB drive > on USB) > > Thanks again for any input! > > Carmen > > > > |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey Walter!
> Here's a site that describes virtual memory pretty well, maybe it'll > give you some insites: > http://aumha.org/a/xpvm.htm Thanks I'll go have a read... > You might try testing the sticks one-by-one to see if that makes any > difference. I.e., pull one out, start computer, run CheckIt. Repeat > with other stick. If *no* errors come up, then it's probably a problem > with CheckIt itself. If you get an with one or the other stick, but > not both, then you've found the trouble. If *both* fail, then your > back at square one. Ewwwww... you mean I'll have to do what I figured I'd have to do (but thought I could skip if one of the luminaries in this newsgroup knew the answer)?! How very *inconvenient*! :-) Thanks for the advice. I'll try this out today and see what happens... C. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks Andrew! I'll go download the program and see what happens...
C. "Andrew E." <eckrichco@msn.com> wrote in message news:5BDB6F2D-1C7E-4F38-9902-F75200BBF0C8@microsoft.com... > With pc 3200 memory,or any memory on newer boards,you should have > both memory sticks the same size,if diffrent sizes-mb are used then > configure > two in slot 1 and 3,and other in 2 and 4,if diffrent are to be used.Some > boards > wont even run if the 2 are diffrent.However,to test memory,test it in > DOS,if it > works as the test results display,quit worrying about it.To test download > tester > at:http:www.oca.microsoft.com/en/windiag.asp > > "Carmen Gauvin-O'Donnell" wrote: > >> Hi everyone! >> >> I'm not a computer newbie, but I am new to this issue and could use some >> assistance. >> >> I just upgraded my computer's memory (PC 3200 DDR 400). I now have 1.5 >> gigs >> or so, as in 1 x 512 mg no name and 1 x 1 GB Kingmax brand in a Pentium 4 >> @ >> 3 GHz running XP SP2 >> >> Everything seems to be running fine in that the system recognizes the >> memory >> and performance is good. >> >> Odd thing is when I run a nifty program I have called Check It >> Diagnostics, >> specifically the memory test portion of it... I get the following error >> message in the report: >> >> "Memory Test >> Optimizing Test Memory Size... >> ----> Memory Allocation Failed! >> ----> Test Failed >> >> Found Error(s)" >> >> Anyone have any idea what they're going on about? >> >> Also does anyone have insights on that whole Virtual Memory thing? How >> should it be set in a system like mine (80 GB hard drive with a 200 GB >> drive >> on USB) >> >> Thanks again for any input! >> >> Carmen >> >> >> >> |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wed, 4 Jan 2006 23:58:29 -0500 from Carmen Gauvin-O'Donnell <seegod1
@cogeco.ca>: > Odd thing is when I run a nifty program I have called Check It Diagnostics, > specifically the memory test portion of it... I get the following error > message in the report: > > "Memory Test > Optimizing Test Memory Size... > ----> Memory Allocation Failed! > ----> Test Failed > > Found Error(s)" > > Anyone have any idea what they're going on about? It sounds to me like a program error. The easy way to test that diagnosis is just to try a different program. The one that saved my bacon is from www.memtest.org -- download a bootable image and burn to a bootable CD or floppy, then boot your computer and let it run. If there are memory problems they'll show up within the first half hour or so. > Also does anyone have insights on that whole Virtual Memory thing? How > should it be set in a system like mine (80 GB hard drive with a 200 GB drive > on USB) I asked this question when I got my XP system about a year ago, and the best answer I got was "don't monkey with it; XP manages virtual memory on its own much better than Win 9x." For explanations, see <http://www.aumha.org/win5/a/xpvm.htm>. -- Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA http://OakRoadSystems.com/ "Do I smell the revolting stench of self-esteem?" -- Jon Lovitz, in /The Producers/ (2005) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| BDD - ZTI.vbs error -2147467259 when connecting to AdminDB under WinPE | nospam@area51.org.au | Windows XP Setup Deployment | 3 | 01-05-2006 03:59 PM |
| Re: Why am I short of virtual memory? (I think I should be ok) | Wadsworth Paul | Windows XP Perform Maintain | 2 | 01-05-2006 06:06 AM |
| Less memory installed than available? | Matti Zeus Memory | Windows XP Perform Maintain | 1 | 01-05-2006 06:00 AM |
| speed of pc memory | mand | Windows XP Hardware | 13 | 01-05-2006 02:17 AM |
| USB Mass Storage Device - This device cannot start. (Code 10) | lobo201 | Windows XP Hardware | 11 | 01-05-2006 02:15 AM |