|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
[Followup-to set for microsoft.public.security]
The Advisory as updated on 30 Dec-05 now states that Software DEP does *not* block the exploit. http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sec...ry/912840.mspx <QP> I have DEP enabled on my system, does this help mitigate the vulnerability? Software based DEP does not mitigate the vulnerability. However, Hardware based DEP may work when enabled: please consult with your hardware manufacturer for more information on how to enable this and whether it can provide mitigation. </QP> -- ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear) MS MVP-Windows (IE/OE, Shell/User, Security), Aumha.org VSOP, DTS-L.org PA Bear wrote: > In fact, there are various recent posts elsewhere stating that DEP blocked > the exploit. YMMV. > > jacecarter@gmail.com wrote: > > Data Execution Prevention? > > What happened to DEP in XP SP2? > > > > If this is a buffer overflow exploit, why then isn't DEP in XP SP2 > > shutting down the malicious code before it can run? > > > > I would think that an image file would be marked as "data" in memory, > > not as an executable image, although WMF might be different than say a > > jpg or bmp, does anyone know for sure? > > > > I keep my DEP setting on "Turn on DEP for all programs and services > > except those I select" > > > > http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sec.../depcnfxp.mspx > > > > "Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2 (SP2) helps protect your computer > > against the insertion of malicious code into areas of computer memory > > reserved for non-executable code by implementing a set of hardware and > > software-enforced technologies called Data Execution Prevention (DEP). > > Hardware-enforced DEP is a feature of certain processors that prevents > > the execution of code in memory regions that are marked as data > > storage. This feature is also known as No-Execute and Execution > > Protection. Windows XP SP2 also includes software-enforced DEP that is > > designed to reduce exploits of exception handling mechanisms in > > Windows. > > > > Unlike an antivirus program, hardware and software-enforced DEP > > technologies are not designed to prevent harmful programs from being > > installed on your computer. Instead, they monitor your installed > > programs to help determine if they are using system memory safely. To > > monitor your programs, hardware-enforced DEP tracks memory locations > > declared as "non-executable". To help prevent malicious code, when > > memory is declared "non-executable" and a program tries to execute code > > from the memory, Windows will close that program. This occurs whether > > the code is malicious or not." |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MS Security Bulletin MS06-001: Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could Allow Remote Code Execution (912919) | PA Bear | Internet Explorer 6 | 0 | 01-05-2006 11:15 PM |
| Re: Microsoft Security Advisory (912840): Vulnerability in Graphics Re | Stephen Howe | Windows XP General | 8 | 01-05-2006 02:28 AM |
| Re: Microsoft Security Advisory (912840): Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could Allow Remote Code Execution | Kerry Brown | Windows XP General | 1 | 01-05-2006 02:25 AM |
| Re: Microsoft Security Advisory (912840): Vulnerability in Graphics Re | PA Bear | Windows XP General | 0 | 01-05-2006 02:25 AM |
| Re: Microsoft Security Advisory (912840): Vulnerability in Graphic | Tom [Pepper] Willett | Windows XP General | 0 | 01-05-2006 02:24 AM |