|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi,
I use ZoneAlarm Pro (ZAP), which includes options for e-mail scanning and spyware scanning. I want to minimize redundancy. (1) I also use Kaspersky AV Personal (KAV); both it and ZAP can scan e-mail (as I recall, same goes for AVG). Which is the better line of defense here (other than good judgment, of course); I would suspect KAV to be more up-to-date, so could switch ZAP off without loss of security and a modicum (perhaps?) performance gain. Thoughts? (2) Similar situation for spyware scanning; ZAP comes with a scanner, but I don't have a feel for how good it is compared to other products. Is there a dominant resident spyware scanner out there that makes ZAP unnecessary? I seek protection above and beyond an up-to-date HOSTS file and scans with Spybot S&D and Ad-Aware. Many thanks in advance for advice. Dave Braden |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
You do *not* need any E-mail scanning. Since you are using Outlook Express
this can be a problem if you do. If your AV software is working correctly, it will catch any virus anyway. I use Outlook Express, Zone Alarm and AVG. I have Zone Alarm and AVG E-mail scanning turned off. In fact I never even installed AVG's E-mail scanning component. More info... The Other E-Mail Threat: File Corruption in Outlook Express Published: November 18, 2004 By Tom Koch http://www.microsoft.com/windows/IE/...orruption.mspx [[As surprising and ironic as it may seem though, the most common cause of DBX corruption is not a virus, but rather anti-virus programs that are configured to scan incoming or outgoing e-mail. Even the most well-known anti-virus programs have exhibited this problem from time to time. ]] Scroll down to: Viral Irony: The Most Common Cause of Corruption or click... http://www.microsoft.com/windows/IE/...ion.mspx#EOAAC ---- [[In fact, .]] Messages in Inbox or other mail folders disappear http://insideoe.tomsterdam.com/probl...s.htm#mailgone ---- [[Disabling Email Scanning does not leave you unprotected against viruses that are distributed as email attachments. Norton AntiVirus Auto-Protect scans incoming files as they are saved to your hard drive, including email and email attachments. Email Scanning is just another layer on top of this. To make sure that Auto-Protect is providing the maximum protection, keep Auto-Protect enabled and run LiveUpdate regularly to ensure that you have the most recent virus definitions.]] Frequently asked questions about Norton AntiVirus Email Scanning http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT...= bar_sch_nam -- Hope this helps. Let us know. Wes MS-MVP Windows Shell/User In news:ezPp16LEGHA.2912@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl, David J. Braden <dbraden@nomail.invalid> hunted and pecked: > Hi, > I use ZoneAlarm Pro (ZAP), which includes options for e-mail scanning and > spyware scanning. I want to minimize redundancy. > > (1) I also use Kaspersky AV Personal (KAV); both it and ZAP can scan > e-mail (as I recall, same goes for AVG). Which is the better line of > defense here (other than good judgment, of course); I would suspect KAV > to be more up-to-date, so could switch ZAP off without loss of security > and a modicum (perhaps?) performance gain. Thoughts? > > (2) Similar situation for spyware scanning; ZAP comes with a scanner, but > I don't have a feel for how good it is compared to other products. Is > there a dominant resident spyware scanner out there that makes ZAP > unnecessary? I seek protection above and beyond an up-to-date HOSTS file > and scans with Spybot S&D and Ad-Aware. > > Many thanks in advance for advice. > > Dave Braden |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Super! Any thoughts on my second question re the spyware scanner in ZAP?
Many thanks, Wes. Dave "Wesley Vogel" <123WVogel955@comcast.net> wrote in message news:uN3OFMMEGHA.1508@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > You do *not* need any E-mail scanning. Since you are using Outlook > Express > this can be a problem if you do. If your AV software is working > correctly, > it will catch any virus anyway. > > I use Outlook Express, Zone Alarm and AVG. > > I have Zone Alarm and AVG E-mail scanning turned off. In fact I never > even > installed AVG's E-mail scanning component. > > More info... > > The Other E-Mail Threat: File Corruption in Outlook Express > Published: November 18, 2004 > By Tom Koch > http://www.microsoft.com/windows/IE/...orruption.mspx > > [[As surprising and ironic as it may seem though, the most common cause of > DBX corruption is not a virus, but rather anti-virus programs that are > configured to scan incoming or outgoing e-mail. Even the most well-known > anti-virus programs have exhibited this problem from time to time. ]] > > Scroll down to: > Viral Irony: The Most Common Cause of Corruption > or click... > http://www.microsoft.com/windows/IE/...ion.mspx#EOAAC > > ---- > > [[In fact, .]] > Messages in Inbox or other mail folders disappear > http://insideoe.tomsterdam.com/probl...s.htm#mailgone > > ---- > > [[Disabling Email Scanning does not leave you unprotected against viruses > that are distributed as email attachments. Norton AntiVirus Auto-Protect > scans incoming files as they are saved to your hard drive, including email > and email attachments. Email Scanning is just another layer on top of > this. > To make sure that Auto-Protect is providing the maximum protection, keep > Auto-Protect enabled and run LiveUpdate regularly to ensure that you have > the most recent virus definitions.]] > Frequently asked questions about Norton AntiVirus Email Scanning > http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT...= bar_sch_nam > > > -- > Hope this helps. Let us know. > > Wes > MS-MVP Windows Shell/User > > In news:ezPp16LEGHA.2912@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl, > David J. Braden <dbraden@nomail.invalid> hunted and pecked: >> Hi, >> I use ZoneAlarm Pro (ZAP), which includes options for e-mail scanning and >> spyware scanning. I want to minimize redundancy. >> >> (1) I also use Kaspersky AV Personal (KAV); both it and ZAP can scan >> e-mail (as I recall, same goes for AVG). Which is the better line of >> defense here (other than good judgment, of course); I would suspect KAV >> to be more up-to-date, so could switch ZAP off without loss of security >> and a modicum (perhaps?) performance gain. Thoughts? >> >> (2) Similar situation for spyware scanning; ZAP comes with a scanner, but >> I don't have a feel for how good it is compared to other products. Is >> there a dominant resident spyware scanner out there that makes ZAP >> unnecessary? I seek protection above and beyond an up-to-date HOSTS file >> and scans with Spybot S&D and Ad-Aware. >> >> Many thanks in advance for advice. >> >> Dave Braden > |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dave,
I know nothing about ZAP's spyware scanner. I use Bazooka Spyware Scanner, HijackThis, Spybot - S & D, SpywareBlaster and the MVPS HOSTS file. I use no resident spyware scanner, although Spybot - S & D has one. SpywareBlaster offers real time protection by setting the ActiveX kill bits in the registry, so it does not have to run to work, only for updates. Some folks like Microsoft AntiSpyware and it has a real time scanner. -- Hope this helps. Let us know. Wes MS-MVP Windows Shell/User In news:em%23z4hXEGHA.524@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl, David J. Braden <dbraden@nomail.invalid> hunted and pecked: > Super! Any thoughts on my second question re the spyware scanner in ZAP? > Many thanks, Wes. > Dave > > "Wesley Vogel" <123WVogel955@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:uN3OFMMEGHA.1508@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... >> You do *not* need any E-mail scanning. Since you are using Outlook >> Express >> this can be a problem if you do. If your AV software is working >> correctly, >> it will catch any virus anyway. >> >> I use Outlook Express, Zone Alarm and AVG. >> >> I have Zone Alarm and AVG E-mail scanning turned off. In fact I never >> even >> installed AVG's E-mail scanning component. >> >> More info... >> >> The Other E-Mail Threat: File Corruption in Outlook Express >> Published: November 18, 2004 >> By Tom Koch >> http://www.microsoft.com/windows/IE/...orruption.mspx >> >> [[As surprising and ironic as it may seem though, the most common cause >> of DBX corruption is not a virus, but rather anti-virus programs that are >> configured to scan incoming or outgoing e-mail. Even the most well-known >> anti-virus programs have exhibited this problem from time to time. ]] >> >> Scroll down to: >> Viral Irony: The Most Common Cause of Corruption >> or click... >> http://www.microsoft.com/windows/IE/...ion.mspx#EOAAC >> >> ---- >> >> [[In fact, .]] >> Messages in Inbox or other mail folders disappear >> http://insideoe.tomsterdam.com/probl...s.htm#mailgone >> >> ---- >> >> [[Disabling Email Scanning does not leave you unprotected against viruses >> that are distributed as email attachments. Norton AntiVirus Auto-Protect >> scans incoming files as they are saved to your hard drive, including >> email and email attachments. Email Scanning is just another layer on top >> of this. >> To make sure that Auto-Protect is providing the maximum protection, keep >> Auto-Protect enabled and run LiveUpdate regularly to ensure that you have >> the most recent virus definitions.]] >> Frequently asked questions about Norton AntiVirus Email Scanning >> http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT...= bar_sch_nam >> >> >> -- >> Hope this helps. Let us know. >> >> Wes >> MS-MVP Windows Shell/User >> >> In news:ezPp16LEGHA.2912@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl, >> David J. Braden <dbraden@nomail.invalid> hunted and pecked: >>> Hi, >>> I use ZoneAlarm Pro (ZAP), which includes options for e-mail scanning >>> and spyware scanning. I want to minimize redundancy. >>> >>> (1) I also use Kaspersky AV Personal (KAV); both it and ZAP can scan >>> e-mail (as I recall, same goes for AVG). Which is the better line of >>> defense here (other than good judgment, of course); I would suspect KAV >>> to be more up-to-date, so could switch ZAP off without loss of security >>> and a modicum (perhaps?) performance gain. Thoughts? >>> >>> (2) Similar situation for spyware scanning; ZAP comes with a scanner, >>> but I don't have a feel for how good it is compared to other products. >>> Is there a dominant resident spyware scanner out there that makes ZAP >>> unnecessary? I seek protection above and beyond an up-to-date HOSTS file >>> and scans with Spybot S&D and Ad-Aware. >>> >>> Many thanks in advance for advice. >>> >>> Dave Braden |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wesley Vogel wrote:
> I know nothing about ZAP's spyware scanner. It's no better than any other scanner out there. And once I realized that I stopped subscribing to ZA Pro. > Some folks like Microsoft AntiSpyware and it has a real time scanner. Works great for me. Occasionally I run other freebies, and they don't find anything wrong. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|