"Doug Kanter" <ancientangler@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:2kRuf.2725$OU3.1394@news01.roc.ny...
> "David Candy" <.> wrote in message
> news:OwptuwTEGHA.268@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Why waste time on someone talking about something they no nothing about
> and
> without the intellectual firepower to understand simple logic. Prove your
> assertion. Show me some memory that is being held by an application that
> has
> terminated.
> ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
>
> Let's take this a step at a time, just so I know what I'm dealing with
> here.
>
> 1) Are you a programmer?
>
> 2) If you are a programmer, are you saying you've never heard of this
> phenomenon?
>
> 3) If you are NOT a programmer, what special knowledge (or secret
> information) do you think you have, which enables you to doubt a
> phenomenon
> which has been discussed ad nauseum in the computer press for many years?
>
>

"David Candy" <.> wrote in message
news:e7Tc6LUEGHA.3468@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
1. Yes but is not relevent at all.
2. That is correct.
3. Idiots discussing something doesn't make it true. If you are merely
saying there is less free memory after starting and then exiting a program
then this does not prove your comment. Why would you assume that the
application has the memory? How can it have the memory - it no longer
exists.

Where is this memory? If you can't point to it you only have an unproven
hypothsis. What mechanism causes this memory not to be freed?
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

Based on your responses thus far, it's clear that you are young and
inexperienced. You also missed an entire chapter in your computer science
curriculum, and you're bitter & defensive about things you've never heard
of. That's too bad, since it's your responsibility as an adult to continue
your education every single day. How is it that your professors never taught
you about one of the most basic "gotchas" in programming? This is like a
doctor knowing nothing about tetanus shots.

Google is your friend. Here's a sample:

http://techrepublic.com.com/5100-3513_11-5533338.html
VB6 Tip: Best practices requires that you ensure all forms unload

"When a Visual Basic 6 program ends, all of its forms should be unloaded and
removed from memory. VB doesn't do this automatically; therefore, if your
program contains a lot of forms, it's possible for one or more forms to
remain in memory even after the program terminates."

Thanks PA Bear. I am going crazy. Hopefully your suggestions will help
(I'll try at home tonight). WHY is this happening? Like I stated before, I
found this problem several times on google (lots mentioned deleting
folders.dbx, which didn't solve the problem), but why does it happen?

"PA Bear" wrote:

> Start here: http://www.insideoe.com/problems/errors.htm#crash
>
> General OE Caveats:
>
> - Don't use Inbox or Sent Items to archive messages. Move them to local
> folders created for this purpose.
>
> - Empty Deleted Items folder daily.
>
> - Disable Background Compacting [N/A in SP2] and frequently perform a manual
> compact of all OE folders while "working offline". More at
> http://www.insideoe.com/files/maintain.htm.
>
> - Do not attempt to close OE via Task Manager or shutdown your machine if
> Automatic Compacting is taking place (WinXP SP2 only).
>
> - Your anti-virus application's email scanning feature can also cause
> corruption. Disable it. It provides no additional protection.
>
> --
> OE6-specific newsgroup:
> news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsof...tlooke xpress
> OE General newsgroup:
> news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsof...xpress.general
>
> ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
> MS MVP-Windows (IE/OE, Shell/User, Security), Aumha.org VSOP, DTS-L.org
>
>
> Heather Westrick wrote:
> > I have a new Dell Dimension, XP Media Center Edition. I use Outlook
> > Express
> > 6.0 to read my email from my DSL provider. OE works fine the first time I
> > get in and use it (after reboot); sometimes works fine a second time too.
> > However, when I try to get in the third time, I double click the icon and
> > it does nothing. When I do ctl-alt-del, it shows msimn.exe still
> > running, even though I closed it. When I right-click to
> > run via my shortcut, or via the start menu, I get the following error:
> > "Outlook
> > express could not be started because your computer is low on system
> > resources.
> > Most likely the problem is your computer is low on memory or unstable". I
> > am using OE version 6.00.2900.2180.
> >
> > I've done my system updates. No viruses found either. I found this
> > problem on google, but MS didn't mention it.
> >
> > Also, I can't click on 'mail here' links on Internet Explorer, because
> > Outlook Express won't open. When I end process msimn.exe, I can get back
> > into Outlook Express, can use 'mail here' links on the net, etc.
> >
> > Why isn't OE shutting down? Please help!
>
>

The first generation of your calculator chip that you are using in your computer (called the 4004 in those days - the first 1 chip calculator) and me started our careers together. And your P4 or whatever can still act as a calculator chip. Though we only played with ICs that might have as many as 8 flip flops on it.

But most of my education is in Applied Science (health) or Social Science.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Goodbye Web Diary
http://margokingston.typepad.com/har....html#comments
=================================================
"Doug Kanter" <ancientangler@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:t5Suf.1128$qg.13@news02.roc.ny...
> "Doug Kanter" <ancientangler@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:2kRuf.2725$OU3.1394@news01.roc.ny...
>> "David Candy" <.> wrote in message
>> news:OwptuwTEGHA.268@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> Why waste time on someone talking about something they no nothing about
>> and
>> without the intellectual firepower to understand simple logic. Prove your
>> assertion. Show me some memory that is being held by an application that
>> has
>> terminated.
>> ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
>>
>> Let's take this a step at a time, just so I know what I'm dealing with
>> here.
>>
>> 1) Are you a programmer?
>>
>> 2) If you are a programmer, are you saying you've never heard of this
>> phenomenon?
>>
>> 3) If you are NOT a programmer, what special knowledge (or secret
>> information) do you think you have, which enables you to doubt a
>> phenomenon
>> which has been discussed ad nauseum in the computer press for many years?
>>
>>
>
> "David Candy" <.> wrote in message
> news:e7Tc6LUEGHA.3468@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> 1. Yes but is not relevent at all.
> 2. That is correct.
> 3. Idiots discussing something doesn't make it true. If you are merely
> saying there is less free memory after starting and then exiting a program
> then this does not prove your comment. Why would you assume that the
> application has the memory? How can it have the memory - it no longer
> exists.
>
> Where is this memory? If you can't point to it you only have an unproven
> hypothsis. What mechanism causes this memory not to be freed?
> ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
>
> Based on your responses thus far, it's clear that you are young and
> inexperienced. You also missed an entire chapter in your computer science
> curriculum, and you're bitter & defensive about things you've never heard
> of. That's too bad, since it's your responsibility as an adult to continue
> your education every single day. How is it that your professors never taught
> you about one of the most basic "gotchas" in programming? This is like a
> doctor knowing nothing about tetanus shots.
>
> Google is your friend. Here's a sample:
>
> http://techrepublic.com.com/5100-3513_11-5533338.html
> VB6 Tip: Best practices requires that you ensure all forms unload
>
> "When a Visual Basic 6 program ends, all of its forms should be unloaded and
> removed from memory. VB doesn't do this automatically; therefore, if your
> program contains a lot of forms, it's possible for one or more forms to
> remain in memory even after the program terminates."
>
>

This link I provided works just fine for me in both IE and Firefox. But, it
doesn't matter. The one paragraph excerpt I gave you is all you need to
know, unless you tell me politely that you're interested in learning about
something you've never heard of before. Since I'm positive you will NOT be
interested, I must warn you that when you choose to stop learning, you're
usually considered to be clinically dead.


"David Candy" <.> wrote in message
news:eMBzJcUEGHA.2912@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
What a load of crap. It's not possible. That page you sent is blank.

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Goodbye Web Diary
http://margokingston.typepad.com/har....html#comments
=================================================
"Doug Kanter" <ancientangler@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:t5Suf.1128$qg.13@news02.roc.ny...
> "Doug Kanter" <ancientangler@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:2kRuf.2725$OU3.1394@news01.roc.ny...
>> "David Candy" <.> wrote in message
>> news:OwptuwTEGHA.268@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> Why waste time on someone talking about something they no nothing about
>> and
>> without the intellectual firepower to understand simple logic. Prove your
>> assertion. Show me some memory that is being held by an application that
>> has
>> terminated.
>> ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
>>
>> Let's take this a step at a time, just so I know what I'm dealing with
>> here.
>>
>> 1) Are you a programmer?
>>
>> 2) If you are a programmer, are you saying you've never heard of this
>> phenomenon?
>>
>> 3) If you are NOT a programmer, what special knowledge (or secret
>> information) do you think you have, which enables you to doubt a
>> phenomenon
>> which has been discussed ad nauseum in the computer press for many years?
>>
>>
>
> "David Candy" <.> wrote in message
> news:e7Tc6LUEGHA.3468@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> 1. Yes but is not relevent at all.
> 2. That is correct.
> 3. Idiots discussing something doesn't make it true. If you are merely
> saying there is less free memory after starting and then exiting a program
> then this does not prove your comment. Why would you assume that the
> application has the memory? How can it have the memory - it no longer
> exists.
>
> Where is this memory? If you can't point to it you only have an unproven
> hypothsis. What mechanism causes this memory not to be freed?
> ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
>
> Based on your responses thus far, it's clear that you are young and
> inexperienced. You also missed an entire chapter in your computer science
> curriculum, and you're bitter & defensive about things you've never heard
> of. That's too bad, since it's your responsibility as an adult to continue
> your education every single day. How is it that your professors never
> taught
> you about one of the most basic "gotchas" in programming? This is like a
> doctor knowing nothing about tetanus shots.
>
> Google is your friend. Here's a sample:
>
> http://techrepublic.com.com/5100-3513_11-5533338.html
> VB6 Tip: Best practices requires that you ensure all forms unload
>
> "When a Visual Basic 6 program ends, all of its forms should be unloaded
> and
> removed from memory. VB doesn't do this automatically; therefore, if your
> program contains a lot of forms, it's possible for one or more forms to
> remain in memory even after the program terminates."
>
>

OK...let me get this straight: I've read countless articles about this
memory problem over the years, and you're telling me I've been
hallucinating? And better yet, this opinion is based on your having no
education in computer programming?


"David Candy" <.> wrote in message
news:OoPRngUEGHA.1312@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
The first generation of your calculator chip that you are using in your
computer (called the 4004 in those days - the first 1 chip calculator) and
me started our careers together. And your P4 or whatever can still act as a
calculator chip. Though we only played with ICs that might have as many as 8
flip flops on it.

But most of my education is in Applied Science (health) or Social Science.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Goodbye Web Diary
http://margokingston.typepad.com/har....html#comments
=================================================
"Doug Kanter" <ancientangler@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:t5Suf.1128$qg.13@news02.roc.ny...
> "Doug Kanter" <ancientangler@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:2kRuf.2725$OU3.1394@news01.roc.ny...
>> "David Candy" <.> wrote in message
>> news:OwptuwTEGHA.268@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> Why waste time on someone talking about something they no nothing about
>> and
>> without the intellectual firepower to understand simple logic. Prove your
>> assertion. Show me some memory that is being held by an application that
>> has
>> terminated.
>> ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
>>
>> Let's take this a step at a time, just so I know what I'm dealing with
>> here.
>>
>> 1) Are you a programmer?
>>
>> 2) If you are a programmer, are you saying you've never heard of this
>> phenomenon?
>>
>> 3) If you are NOT a programmer, what special knowledge (or secret
>> information) do you think you have, which enables you to doubt a
>> phenomenon
>> which has been discussed ad nauseum in the computer press for many years?
>>
>>
>
> "David Candy" <.> wrote in message
> news:e7Tc6LUEGHA.3468@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> 1. Yes but is not relevent at all.
> 2. That is correct.
> 3. Idiots discussing something doesn't make it true. If you are merely
> saying there is less free memory after starting and then exiting a program
> then this does not prove your comment. Why would you assume that the
> application has the memory? How can it have the memory - it no longer
> exists.
>
> Where is this memory? If you can't point to it you only have an unproven
> hypothsis. What mechanism causes this memory not to be freed?
> ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
>
> Based on your responses thus far, it's clear that you are young and
> inexperienced. You also missed an entire chapter in your computer science
> curriculum, and you're bitter & defensive about things you've never heard
> of. That's too bad, since it's your responsibility as an adult to continue
> your education every single day. How is it that your professors never
> taught
> you about one of the most basic "gotchas" in programming? This is like a
> doctor knowing nothing about tetanus shots.
>
> Google is your friend. Here's a sample:
>
> http://techrepublic.com.com/5100-3513_11-5533338.html
> VB6 Tip: Best practices requires that you ensure all forms unload
>
> "When a Visual Basic 6 program ends, all of its forms should be unloaded
> and
> removed from memory. VB doesn't do this automatically; therefore, if your
> program contains a lot of forms, it's possible for one or more forms to
> remain in memory even after the program terminates."
>
>

You are a fool. An idiot saying something doesn't make it true.,

Where is your explanation on how this happens. AS it is fu%kin well known that you are telling lies.

So liar, put up or shut up. You are a fool sporouting shit.

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Goodbye Web Diary
http://margokingston.typepad.com/har....html#comments
=================================================
"Doug Kanter" <ancientangler@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:KzSuf.1131$qg.21@news02.roc.ny...
> This link I provided works just fine for me in both IE and Firefox. But, it
> doesn't matter. The one paragraph excerpt I gave you is all you need to
> know, unless you tell me politely that you're interested in learning about
> something you've never heard of before. Since I'm positive you will NOT be
> interested, I must warn you that when you choose to stop learning, you're
> usually considered to be clinically dead.
>
>
> "David Candy" <.> wrote in message
> news:eMBzJcUEGHA.2912@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> What a load of crap. It's not possible. That page you sent is blank.
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Goodbye Web Diary
> http://margokingston.typepad.com/har....html#comments
> =================================================
> "Doug Kanter" <ancientangler@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:t5Suf.1128$qg.13@news02.roc.ny...
>> "Doug Kanter" <ancientangler@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:2kRuf.2725$OU3.1394@news01.roc.ny...
>>> "David Candy" <.> wrote in message
>>> news:OwptuwTEGHA.268@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>>> Why waste time on someone talking about something they no nothing about
>>> and
>>> without the intellectual firepower to understand simple logic. Prove your
>>> assertion. Show me some memory that is being held by an application that
>>> has
>>> terminated.
>>> ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
>>>
>>> Let's take this a step at a time, just so I know what I'm dealing with
>>> here.
>>>
>>> 1) Are you a programmer?
>>>
>>> 2) If you are a programmer, are you saying you've never heard of this
>>> phenomenon?
>>>
>>> 3) If you are NOT a programmer, what special knowledge (or secret
>>> information) do you think you have, which enables you to doubt a
>>> phenomenon
>>> which has been discussed ad nauseum in the computer press for many years?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> "David Candy" <.> wrote in message
>> news:e7Tc6LUEGHA.3468@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>> 1. Yes but is not relevent at all.
>> 2. That is correct.
>> 3. Idiots discussing something doesn't make it true. If you are merely
>> saying there is less free memory after starting and then exiting a program
>> then this does not prove your comment. Why would you assume that the
>> application has the memory? How can it have the memory - it no longer
>> exists.
>>
>> Where is this memory? If you can't point to it you only have an unproven
>> hypothsis. What mechanism causes this memory not to be freed?
>> ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
>>
>> Based on your responses thus far, it's clear that you are young and
>> inexperienced. You also missed an entire chapter in your computer science
>> curriculum, and you're bitter & defensive about things you've never heard
>> of. That's too bad, since it's your responsibility as an adult to continue
>> your education every single day. How is it that your professors never
>> taught
>> you about one of the most basic "gotchas" in programming? This is like a
>> doctor knowing nothing about tetanus shots.
>>
>> Google is your friend. Here's a sample:
>>
>> http://techrepublic.com.com/5100-3513_11-5533338.html
>> VB6 Tip: Best practices requires that you ensure all forms unload
>>
>> "When a Visual Basic 6 program ends, all of its forms should be unloaded
>> and
>> removed from memory. VB doesn't do this automatically; therefore, if your
>> program contains a lot of forms, it's possible for one or more forms to
>> remain in memory even after the program terminates."
>>
>>
>
>

You are an idiot associating with other idiots. It is not true. If you want to gibve a f*kcin example I'll tell you why it appears that way pedophile.

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Goodbye Web Diary
http://margokingston.typepad.com/har....html#comments
=================================================
"Doug Kanter" <ancientangler@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:NASuf.1132$qg.656@news02.roc.ny...
>
> OK...let me get this straight: I've read countless articles about this
> memory problem over the years, and you're telling me I've been
> hallucinating? And better yet, this opinion is based on your having no
> education in computer programming?
>
>
> "David Candy" <.> wrote in message
> news:OoPRngUEGHA.1312@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> The first generation of your calculator chip that you are using in your
> computer (called the 4004 in those days - the first 1 chip calculator) and
> me started our careers together. And your P4 or whatever can still act as a
> calculator chip. Though we only played with ICs that might have as many as 8
> flip flops on it.
>
> But most of my education is in Applied Science (health) or Social Science.
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Goodbye Web Diary
> http://margokingston.typepad.com/har....html#comments
> =================================================
> "Doug Kanter" <ancientangler@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:t5Suf.1128$qg.13@news02.roc.ny...
>> "Doug Kanter" <ancientangler@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:2kRuf.2725$OU3.1394@news01.roc.ny...
>>> "David Candy" <.> wrote in message
>>> news:OwptuwTEGHA.268@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>>> Why waste time on someone talking about something they no nothing about
>>> and
>>> without the intellectual firepower to understand simple logic. Prove your
>>> assertion. Show me some memory that is being held by an application that
>>> has
>>> terminated.
>>> ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
>>>
>>> Let's take this a step at a time, just so I know what I'm dealing with
>>> here.
>>>
>>> 1) Are you a programmer?
>>>
>>> 2) If you are a programmer, are you saying you've never heard of this
>>> phenomenon?
>>>
>>> 3) If you are NOT a programmer, what special knowledge (or secret
>>> information) do you think you have, which enables you to doubt a
>>> phenomenon
>>> which has been discussed ad nauseum in the computer press for many years?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> "David Candy" <.> wrote in message
>> news:e7Tc6LUEGHA.3468@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>> 1. Yes but is not relevent at all.
>> 2. That is correct.
>> 3. Idiots discussing something doesn't make it true. If you are merely
>> saying there is less free memory after starting and then exiting a program
>> then this does not prove your comment. Why would you assume that the
>> application has the memory? How can it have the memory - it no longer
>> exists.
>>
>> Where is this memory? If you can't point to it you only have an unproven
>> hypothsis. What mechanism causes this memory not to be freed?
>> ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
>>
>> Based on your responses thus far, it's clear that you are young and
>> inexperienced. You also missed an entire chapter in your computer science
>> curriculum, and you're bitter & defensive about things you've never heard
>> of. That's too bad, since it's your responsibility as an adult to continue
>> your education every single day. How is it that your professors never
>> taught
>> you about one of the most basic "gotchas" in programming? This is like a
>> doctor knowing nothing about tetanus shots.
>>
>> Google is your friend. Here's a sample:
>>
>> http://techrepublic.com.com/5100-3513_11-5533338.html
>> VB6 Tip: Best practices requires that you ensure all forms unload
>>
>> "When a Visual Basic 6 program ends, all of its forms should be unloaded
>> and
>> removed from memory. VB doesn't do this automatically; therefore, if your
>> program contains a lot of forms, it's possible for one or more forms to
>> remain in memory even after the program terminates."
>>
>>
>
>

I understand that you participate in this group just because you need to say
anything at all, regardless of how vapid it is. Would you like me to
continue leading you around by the nose like a hooked fish?


"David Candy" <.> wrote in message
news:uh39huUEGHA.984@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
You are an idiot associating with other idiots. It is not true. If you want
to gibve a f*kcin example I'll tell you why it appears that way pedophile.

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Goodbye Web Diary
http://margokingston.typepad.com/har....html#comments
=================================================
"Doug Kanter" <ancientangler@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:NASuf.1132$qg.656@news02.roc.ny...
>
> OK...let me get this straight: I've read countless articles about this
> memory problem over the years, and you're telling me I've been
> hallucinating? And better yet, this opinion is based on your having no
> education in computer programming?
>
>
> "David Candy" <.> wrote in message
> news:OoPRngUEGHA.1312@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> The first generation of your calculator chip that you are using in your
> computer (called the 4004 in those days - the first 1 chip calculator) and
> me started our careers together. And your P4 or whatever can still act as
> a
> calculator chip. Though we only played with ICs that might have as many as
> 8
> flip flops on it.
>
> But most of my education is in Applied Science (health) or Social Science.
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Goodbye Web Diary
> http://margokingston.typepad.com/har....html#comments
> =================================================
> "Doug Kanter" <ancientangler@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:t5Suf.1128$qg.13@news02.roc.ny...
>> "Doug Kanter" <ancientangler@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:2kRuf.2725$OU3.1394@news01.roc.ny...
>>> "David Candy" <.> wrote in message
>>> news:OwptuwTEGHA.268@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>>> Why waste time on someone talking about something they no nothing about
>>> and
>>> without the intellectual firepower to understand simple logic. Prove
>>> your
>>> assertion. Show me some memory that is being held by an application that
>>> has
>>> terminated.
>>> ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
>>>
>>> Let's take this a step at a time, just so I know what I'm dealing with
>>> here.
>>>
>>> 1) Are you a programmer?
>>>
>>> 2) If you are a programmer, are you saying you've never heard of this
>>> phenomenon?
>>>
>>> 3) If you are NOT a programmer, what special knowledge (or secret
>>> information) do you think you have, which enables you to doubt a
>>> phenomenon
>>> which has been discussed ad nauseum in the computer press for many
>>> years?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> "David Candy" <.> wrote in message
>> news:e7Tc6LUEGHA.3468@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>> 1. Yes but is not relevent at all.
>> 2. That is correct.
>> 3. Idiots discussing something doesn't make it true. If you are merely
>> saying there is less free memory after starting and then exiting a
>> program
>> then this does not prove your comment. Why would you assume that the
>> application has the memory? How can it have the memory - it no longer
>> exists.
>>
>> Where is this memory? If you can't point to it you only have an unproven
>> hypothsis. What mechanism causes this memory not to be freed?
>> ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
>>
>> Based on your responses thus far, it's clear that you are young and
>> inexperienced. You also missed an entire chapter in your computer science
>> curriculum, and you're bitter & defensive about things you've never heard
>> of. That's too bad, since it's your responsibility as an adult to
>> continue
>> your education every single day. How is it that your professors never
>> taught
>> you about one of the most basic "gotchas" in programming? This is like a
>> doctor knowing nothing about tetanus shots.
>>
>> Google is your friend. Here's a sample:
>>
>> http://techrepublic.com.com/5100-3513_11-5533338.html
>> VB6 Tip: Best practices requires that you ensure all forms unload
>>
>> "When a Visual Basic 6 program ends, all of its forms should be unloaded
>> and
>> removed from memory. VB doesn't do this automatically; therefore, if your
>> program contains a lot of forms, it's possible for one or more forms to
>> remain in memory even after the program terminates."
>>
>>
>
>

Do you want to back up your lies. You're the one talking shit. Lets look at this earlier thread,

http://groups.google.com.au/group/mi...332 5fa3b8fe4

I answered correctly first. Someone gave a link to a page with incorrect details on it (it got the gist of it but is technically wrong - asp.net is not a limited account). Yet because the idiot read it on a web page he thinks it's true. (if you don't believe me review Local Security Policy)

So I get tired of dickheads like you and him.

Put up or shutup.



--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Goodbye Web Diary
http://margokingston.typepad.com/har....html#comments
=================================================
"Doug Kanter" <ancientangler@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:RXSuf.2734$OU3.2523@news01.roc.ny...
>I understand that you participate in this group just because you need to say
> anything at all, regardless of how vapid it is. Would you like me to
> continue leading you around by the nose like a hooked fish?
>
>
> "David Candy" <.> wrote in message
> news:uh39huUEGHA.984@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> You are an idiot associating with other idiots. It is not true. If you want
> to gibve a f*kcin example I'll tell you why it appears that way pedophile.
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Goodbye Web Diary
> http://margokingston.typepad.com/har....html#comments
> =================================================
> "Doug Kanter" <ancientangler@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:NASuf.1132$qg.656@news02.roc.ny...
>>
>> OK...let me get this straight: I've read countless articles about this
>> memory problem over the years, and you're telling me I've been
>> hallucinating? And better yet, this opinion is based on your having no
>> education in computer programming?
>>
>>
>> "David Candy" <.> wrote in message
>> news:OoPRngUEGHA.1312@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> The first generation of your calculator chip that you are using in your
>> computer (called the 4004 in those days - the first 1 chip calculator) and
>> me started our careers together. And your P4 or whatever can still act as
>> a
>> calculator chip. Though we only played with ICs that might have as many as
>> 8
>> flip flops on it.
>>
>> But most of my education is in Applied Science (health) or Social Science.
>> --
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Goodbye Web Diary
>> http://margokingston.typepad.com/har....html#comments
>> =================================================
>> "Doug Kanter" <ancientangler@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:t5Suf.1128$qg.13@news02.roc.ny...
>>> "Doug Kanter" <ancientangler@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:2kRuf.2725$OU3.1394@news01.roc.ny...
>>>> "David Candy" <.> wrote in message
>>>> news:OwptuwTEGHA.268@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>>>> Why waste time on someone talking about something they no nothing about
>>>> and
>>>> without the intellectual firepower to understand simple logic. Prove
>>>> your
>>>> assertion. Show me some memory that is being held by an application that
>>>> has
>>>> terminated.
>>>> ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
>>>>
>>>> Let's take this a step at a time, just so I know what I'm dealing with
>>>> here.
>>>>
>>>> 1) Are you a programmer?
>>>>
>>>> 2) If you are a programmer, are you saying you've never heard of this
>>>> phenomenon?
>>>>
>>>> 3) If you are NOT a programmer, what special knowledge (or secret
>>>> information) do you think you have, which enables you to doubt a
>>>> phenomenon
>>>> which has been discussed ad nauseum in the computer press for many
>>>> years?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> "David Candy" <.> wrote in message
>>> news:e7Tc6LUEGHA.3468@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>>> 1. Yes but is not relevent at all.
>>> 2. That is correct.
>>> 3. Idiots discussing something doesn't make it true. If you are merely
>>> saying there is less free memory after starting and then exiting a
>>> program
>>> then this does not prove your comment. Why would you assume that the
>>> application has the memory? How can it have the memory - it no longer
>>> exists.
>>>
>>> Where is this memory? If you can't point to it you only have an unproven
>>> hypothsis. What mechanism causes this memory not to be freed?
>>> ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
>>>
>>> Based on your responses thus far, it's clear that you are young and
>>> inexperienced. You also missed an entire chapter in your computer science
>>> curriculum, and you're bitter & defensive about things you've never heard
>>> of. That's too bad, since it's your responsibility as an adult to
>>> continue
>>> your education every single day. How is it that your professors never
>>> taught
>>> you about one of the most basic "gotchas" in programming? This is like a
>>> doctor knowing nothing about tetanus shots.
>>>
>>> Google is your friend. Here's a sample:
>>>
>>> http://techrepublic.com.com/5100-3513_11-5533338.html
>>> VB6 Tip: Best practices requires that you ensure all forms unload
>>>
>>> "When a Visual Basic 6 program ends, all of its forms should be unloaded
>>> and
>>> removed from memory. VB doesn't do this automatically; therefore, if your
>>> program contains a lot of forms, it's possible for one or more forms to
>>> remain in memory even after the program terminates."
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

"David Candy" <.> wrote in message
news:uTB3MCVEGHA.2300@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
Do you want to back up your lies. You're the one talking shit. Lets look at
this earlier thread,

http://groups.google.com.au/group/mi...332 5fa3b8fe4

I answered correctly first.
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

Isn't that nice? You answered first. But, that thread has nothing whatsoever
to do with the concept we're discussing here: memory issues

;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;


So I get tired of dickheads like you and him.

Put up or shutup.

;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

Here are some links that will help you. I am not going to explain this to
you. You're going to have to read for yourself. There's a whole world of
information about this issue. You think it doesn't exist because you don't
understand it. How illogical. I doubt you're a professional programmer.


http://forums.csharpcorner.com/F_Sho...21250&PostID=1


This next link includes:
"a method to test for "dirty" apps which fail to release all their allocated
memory when they are closed. "
http://shell-shocked.org/article.php?id=195


Here's a programmer trying to deal with exactly the subject I've taught you
about:
http://www.codeguru.com/forum/archiv.../t-290294.html


Another real programmer trying to learn how to solve the problem
http://www.crystaltech.com/forum/top...TOPIC_ID=13399

Here's a nasty one:
" There is a tool called ObjectAlloc in Xcode that shows objects being
created and released while the program is running. I ran it, and found that
no objects were ever being released in this app - now thats a memory leak -
object were just created and never destroyed. So I started reading up more
on retain / release / autorelease to see what he had going, and I think I
understand it a bit more then I did before. "
http://www.robrohan.com/client/index...CBE919406F6800


Want more??? Sift through the search results:
http://www.google.com/search?q=progr...&start=20&sa=N