|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Does adding 512MB more memory to the Compaq Presario SR1010NX make the
computer act faster? I am happy the way it is doing now with 256 MB, but if it would run faster it would be nice. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
More memory,faster response time in all applications.However,with most
current boards and computers,one must match the memory,if 256mb is current,then add 256mb.If the board supports it,replace the 256 solo with 2 512mb cards. "sonny" wrote: > Does adding 512MB more memory to the Compaq Presario SR1010NX make the > computer act faster? I am happy the way it is doing now with 256 MB, but if > it would run faster it would be nice. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Your reply is very interesting and helpful. Thanks, Andrew.
"Andrew E." wrote: > More memory,faster response time in all applications.However,with most > current boards and computers,one must match the memory,if 256mb is > current,then add 256mb.If the board supports it,replace the 256 solo with > 2 512mb cards. > > "sonny" wrote: > > > Does adding 512MB more memory to the Compaq Presario SR1010NX make the > > computer act faster? I am happy the way it is doing now with 256 MB, but if > > it would run faster it would be nice. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"sonny" <sonny@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>Does adding 512MB more memory to the Compaq Presario SR1010NX make the >computer act faster? I am happy the way it is doing now with 256 MB, but if >it would run faster it would be nice. Adding more memory can noticeably improve performance only if the added memory results in reduced usage of the virtual memory paging file. Therefore if the paging file is not currently being used to any significant extent then adding more memory will not provide a significant improvement. Unfortunately there is no ready way of determing actual paging file usage provided with Windows XP - it does not have an equivalent to the 'Memory Manager - Swap File In Use" reporting provided by the System Monitor utility in Windows 95/98/Me. There is a free utility that you can download and run which will provide this information for you. It was written by MVP Bill James and you can get if from http://www.dougknox.com/xp/utils/xp_pagefilemon.htm or from http://billsway.com/notes_public/WinXP_Tweaks/ If that utility shows actual page file usage of 50 mb or more on a regular basis then that is indicative of fairly significant paging file activity. Adding more RAM will reduce or even eliminate entirely this activity thereby improving performance. This apples regardless of how much or how little RAM is currently installed in the computer, at least up to the 4 gb RAM maximum for Windows XP. Good luck Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada -- Microsoft MVP (1997 - 2006) On-Line Help Computer Service http://onlinehelp.bc.ca |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| BDD - ZTI.vbs error -2147467259 when connecting to AdminDB under WinPE | nospam@area51.org.au | Windows XP Setup Deployment | 3 | 01-05-2006 03:59 PM |
| Re: Why am I short of virtual memory? (I think I should be ok) | Wadsworth Paul | Windows XP Perform Maintain | 2 | 01-05-2006 06:06 AM |
| iMedia memory upgrade | lilmofie | Windows XP Help and Support | 6 | 01-05-2006 02:46 AM |
| Memory + Graphics card 6600 upgrade and random blue screens... | arcturus1111gr@yahoo.gr | Windows XP Hardware | 5 | 01-05-2006 02:23 AM |
| USB Mass Storage Device - This device cannot start. (Code 10) | lobo201 | Windows XP Hardware | 11 | 01-05-2006 02:15 AM |