I barely looked at your sketch. The entire idea that your are proposing is
just not a good one.

Your web server should be able to see these devices if its on the same subnet
as these devices.
--
--------
Ryan


"BMR777" wrote:

> I have a very similar setup for my web server.
>
> I have it like this:
>
> Cable Modem>Desktop with 2 NIC and ICS > Wireless Router Connected VIA
> Crossover Cable > Other PCs on my network.
>
> It works great. All of the PCs behind the router can see each other and
> share files and the printer (on a print server) . The only catch is, as far
> as I know, the web server PC can't see the printer or other PCs. There may
> be a way to do it, but I don't know.
>
> BMR777
> http://www.rusnakweb.com

Not that it really matters any, but this really isn't a simple network. Sure
simple on paper, but you will probably have problems in the long run.
--
--------
Ryan


"kenny" wrote:

> I did not say PCI, I said Pc1 note that that is a number 1 . If you look
> at my illustration on my original post you will understand!
>
>
> "Papa" <bikingis@my.fun> wrote in message
> news:Ovo1NB$$FHA.2320@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> >I don't understand. What does a PCI bus have to do with it? A router, such
> >as the one I described, just needs to connect to a PCs NIC card, which you
> >apparently already have. My external modem connects to the router, not to a
> >PC. Granted, it is a broadband modem.
> >
> > "kenny" <nope@at.all> wrote in message
> > news:e5Hj$c7$FHA.1288@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> >> Please, I said I dont want a router....I made tha clear in the fiirst
> >> post.
> >> I need PC1 to be connected like that with the modem.
> >>
> >> "Papa" <bikingis@my.fun> wrote in message
> >> news:eIw4Wj6$FHA.1268@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> >>> What's wrong with using a router? That's really the simplist, easiest,
> >>> most versatile, way to go. I have 3 PCs, plus a wireless laptop in my
> >>> home network. It was a breeze to install, and all of these computers are
> >>> totally independent of one another in that none of them require that
> >>> some particular PC has to be up and running before another computer can
> >>> access the internet. Yet they can all share files and share output
> >>> devices such as printers, not to mention that adding more PCs to the
> >>> network is a snap if the router has enough ports.
> >>>
> >>> Routers are inexpensive. For example, Amazon is selling the D-Link
> >>> DI-624 Wireless Cable/DSL Router, 4-Port Switch, 802.11g, 108Mbps for
> >>> about $60 right now.
> >>>
> >>> And get rid of ICS. It is OK for a 2-PC network, but that's about it.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>

no problems whatsoever.. worked like a charm!


"Techdango" <Techdango@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:9A547A0C-03DF-42A2-9EFF-5D1F82E0BF93@microsoft.com...
> Not that it really matters any, but this really isn't a simple network.
> Sure
> simple on paper, but you will probably have problems in the long run.
> --
> --------
> Ryan
>
>
> "kenny" wrote:
>
>> I did not say PCI, I said Pc1 note that that is a number 1 . If you
>> look
>> at my illustration on my original post you will understand!
>>
>>
>> "Papa" <bikingis@my.fun> wrote in message
>> news:Ovo1NB$$FHA.2320@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>> >I don't understand. What does a PCI bus have to do with it? A router,
>> >such
>> >as the one I described, just needs to connect to a PCs NIC card, which
>> >you
>> >apparently already have. My external modem connects to the router, not
>> >to a
>> >PC. Granted, it is a broadband modem.
>> >
>> > "kenny" <nope@at.all> wrote in message
>> > news:e5Hj$c7$FHA.1288@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> >> Please, I said I dont want a router....I made tha clear in the fiirst
>> >> post.
>> >> I need PC1 to be connected like that with the modem.
>> >>
>> >> "Papa" <bikingis@my.fun> wrote in message
>> >> news:eIw4Wj6$FHA.1268@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>> >>> What's wrong with using a router? That's really the simplist,
>> >>> easiest,
>> >>> most versatile, way to go. I have 3 PCs, plus a wireless laptop in my
>> >>> home network. It was a breeze to install, and all of these computers
>> >>> are
>> >>> totally independent of one another in that none of them require that
>> >>> some particular PC has to be up and running before another computer
>> >>> can
>> >>> access the internet. Yet they can all share files and share output
>> >>> devices such as printers, not to mention that adding more PCs to the
>> >>> network is a snap if the router has enough ports.
>> >>>
>> >>> Routers are inexpensive. For example, Amazon is selling the D-Link
>> >>> DI-624 Wireless Cable/DSL Router, 4-Port Switch, 802.11g, 108Mbps for
>> >>> about $60 right now.
>> >>>
>> >>> And get rid of ICS. It is OK for a 2-PC network, but that's about it.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>

Excellent! I'm glad to see things ended up working out for you.
--
--------
Ryan


"kenny" wrote:

> no problems whatsoever.. worked like a charm!
>
>
> "Techdango" <Techdango@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:9A547A0C-03DF-42A2-9EFF-5D1F82E0BF93@microsoft.com...
> > Not that it really matters any, but this really isn't a simple network.
> > Sure
> > simple on paper, but you will probably have problems in the long run.
> > --
> > --------
> > Ryan
> >
> >
> > "kenny" wrote:
> >
> >> I did not say PCI, I said Pc1 note that that is a number 1 . If you
> >> look
> >> at my illustration on my original post you will understand!
> >>
> >>
> >> "Papa" <bikingis@my.fun> wrote in message
> >> news:Ovo1NB$$FHA.2320@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> >> >I don't understand. What does a PCI bus have to do with it? A router,
> >> >such
> >> >as the one I described, just needs to connect to a PCs NIC card, which
> >> >you
> >> >apparently already have. My external modem connects to the router, not
> >> >to a
> >> >PC. Granted, it is a broadband modem.
> >> >
> >> > "kenny" <nope@at.all> wrote in message
> >> > news:e5Hj$c7$FHA.1288@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> >> >> Please, I said I dont want a router....I made tha clear in the fiirst
> >> >> post.
> >> >> I need PC1 to be connected like that with the modem.
> >> >>
> >> >> "Papa" <bikingis@my.fun> wrote in message
> >> >> news:eIw4Wj6$FHA.1268@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> >> >>> What's wrong with using a router? That's really the simplist,
> >> >>> easiest,
> >> >>> most versatile, way to go. I have 3 PCs, plus a wireless laptop in my
> >> >>> home network. It was a breeze to install, and all of these computers
> >> >>> are
> >> >>> totally independent of one another in that none of them require that
> >> >>> some particular PC has to be up and running before another computer
> >> >>> can
> >> >>> access the internet. Yet they can all share files and share output
> >> >>> devices such as printers, not to mention that adding more PCs to the
> >> >>> network is a snap if the router has enough ports.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Routers are inexpensive. For example, Amazon is selling the D-Link
> >> >>> DI-624 Wireless Cable/DSL Router, 4-Port Switch, 802.11g, 108Mbps for
> >> >>> about $60 right now.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> And get rid of ICS. It is OK for a 2-PC network, but that's about it.
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>