|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have 4 Western Digital SATA 250mb hard drives with 16 mb cache,
I also have 2 Maxtor 250 PATA with 16 mb cache, 2 D945PSN mother board with an 840 dual core CPU, 2 gigs of ram, I need to build 2 PC's. One for an artist and one for a programmer. For the artist: I'm thinking I should run 2 of the SATA drives in raid 0 and use the 2 PATA (EIDE) configured in raid 1 (mirrored) as storage. On the SATA raid 0 will be windows XP, Photoshop and the Photoshop scratch (temp) files. Should I put the scratch file on the mirrored PATA drives? My main goal of course is to get rid of that stupid flashlite... yes, I've turned off the index service. Waiting for the files to list is driving me crazy. For the programmer: Raid 1 with the remaining 2 SATA drives. Why? Because the programming PC will take days to set up and if the boot drive fails I don't want to have to reinstall all the apps. Reinstalling Photoshop is not that big of a deal. Any improvements to my plan? If I used harddrives with an 8mb cache in raid 0, would I see a differance? Should I use the 16mb PATA in raid 0 and mirror cheaper 8mb cache drives? I guess the question is: do I gain anything by striping drives with a 16mb cache instead of an 8mb cache. I also have a couple of AMD pc's to build next month, should I use the same strategy? TIA |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Desparate to recover from my stupid mistake with mkdosfs. | markh1289@yahoo.com | Windows XP General | 11 | 01-06-2006 02:05 AM |
| Stupid Recording Question | cl | Windows Media Player | 1 | 01-05-2006 04:14 PM |
| Please help, This might be a stupid question..........but I am at | Mary | Windows XP Games | 2 | 01-05-2006 07:53 AM |
| A not so stupid question | kimbabheaven | Windows XP New Users | 4 | 01-05-2006 03:56 AM |