|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
We have an 8 node Lan (Linksys router) at work
that uplinks to a Wan Cable router (not a cable modem) provided by our cable ISP. We used to have a cable modem for our Wan, of which then we utilized the wan port on the Linksys router to jump to the cable modem data port. However when the ISP upgraded to the cable "router" there is no data port, just 4 different ports labeled Lan1, Lan2 etc. So now we jump from the uplink port on the Linksys router to the 1st port on the cable router. We leave the port right before the uplink port on the linksys port empty (common knowledge item). Ok here is the dilemma. All of the nodes that were on the old cable modem/Linksys or Wan/Lan now boot up and work flawlessly on the new topology. I.e. they can see each other on the Lan "and" they can get out thru the cable router uplink to the Wan internet. But we have added two new nodes that were not on the old system. The configure pretty much as expected in setting up the network connection. One is a Compaq the other is an Emachine, both run XPhome. However the two new machines can see the Lan (and we can see them) but they cannot see out thru the cable router uplink to the internet. I've flushed the ipconfig caches, and rebooted to exhaustion. These two refuse to see out. If I switch data cables with two other nodes on the lan, then the nothing changes, the two nodes that did not see Wan "still" do not see Wan and the two that did see the Wan "still" see the Wan even though they are in the same Lan hookup scenario as the two that did not. We are at our wits end with these two machines. We called a computer shop and they said we should reload windows to reset everything. Is there any other solution? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
From: "G" <NoMail@NoSpam>
| We have an 8 node Lan (Linksys router) at work | that uplinks to a Wan Cable router (not a cable modem) | provided by our cable ISP. | We used to have a cable modem for our Wan, of | which then we utilized the wan port on the Linksys | router to jump to the cable modem data port. However | when the ISP upgraded to the cable "router" there is | no data port, just 4 different ports labeled Lan1, Lan2 etc. | So now we jump from the uplink port on the Linksys | router to the 1st port on the cable router. We leave the | port right before the uplink port on the linksys port | empty (common knowledge item). | Ok here is the dilemma. All of the nodes that were on | the old cable modem/Linksys or Wan/Lan now boot | up and work flawlessly on the new topology. I.e. they | can see each other on the Lan "and" they can get out | thru the cable router uplink to the Wan internet. But | we have added two new nodes that were not on the | old system. The configure pretty much as expected in | setting up the network connection. One is a Compaq | the other is an Emachine, both run XPhome. However | the two new machines can see the Lan (and we can see | them) but they cannot see out thru the cable router uplink | to the internet. I've flushed the ipconfig caches, and rebooted | to exhaustion. These two refuse to see out. If I switch | data cables with two other nodes on the lan, then the nothing | changes, the two nodes that did not see Wan "still" do not | see Wan and the two that did see the Wan "still" see the | Wan even though they are in the same Lan hookup scenario | as the two that did not. We are at our wits end with these | two machines. We called a computer shop and they said | we should reload windows to reset everything. | Is there any other solution? | To use Cable Internet you *NEED* a modem. Most Cable ISPs are DOCSIS compliant so any DOCSIS complaint Cable Modem can work with their network. You would then use a Router. I'm not sure if you are using a Linksys BEFSR81 or what model because you failed to post this data. -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
>To use Cable Internet you *NEED* a modem.
>Most Cable ISPs are DOCSIS compliant so any >DOCSIS complaint Cable Modem can work with >their network. --------- I say again as previously posted, We have an 8 node Lan (Linksys router) at work that uplinks to a Wan Cable router (not a cable modem) provided by our cable ISP. There is no Cable Modem. All nodes work except two. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
From: "G" <NoMail@NoSpam>
>> To use Cable Internet you *NEED* a modem. >> Most Cable ISPs are DOCSIS compliant so any >> DOCSIS complaint Cable Modem can work with >> their network. | --------- | I say again as previously posted, | We have an 8 node Lan (Linksys router) at work | that uplinks to a Wan Cable router (not a cable modem) | provided by our cable ISP. | There is no Cable Modem. All nodes work except | two. | Please post the model numbers of both devices. -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
>Please post the model numbers of both devices.
I will fetch that but it will be at least Tuesday night before I can repost since both are at work across town and we are off Monday. I do have that info written down on a sticky note though. Sincerely confused. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"G" <NoMail@NoSpam> wrote:
> One is a Compaq >the other is an Emachine, both run XPhome. I thought that XP Home only supported networks with up to 5 machines. XP Pro supports up to 10 machines. If you need more than that on your network, you need the 'Server' software. I'm not typing this based on my knowledge, only on what I have seen in this newsgroup. I may be wrong, but if I'm right, you'll need to upgrade to xp pro on those two machines. Maybe someone else can chime in here and verify my thoughts on the matter. -- Zilbandy - Tucson, Arizona USA <zil@zilbandyREMOVE THIS.com> Dead Suburban's Home Page: http://zilbandy.com/suburb/ PGP Public Key: http://zilbandy.com/pgpkey.htm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Go to a working computer, open dos command prompt and type ipconfig - note
results Go to non-working computer and repeat above. Check that non working is on the same subnet and that the gateway IP address is the same Dick "G" <NoMail@NoSpam> wrote in message news:dom4hm0j6s@news3.newsguy.com... > We have an 8 node Lan (Linksys router) at work > that uplinks to a Wan Cable router (not a cable modem) > provided by our cable ISP. > We used to have a cable modem for our Wan, of > which then we utilized the wan port on the Linksys > router to jump to the cable modem data port. However > when the ISP upgraded to the cable "router" there is > no data port, just 4 different ports labeled Lan1, Lan2 etc. > So now we jump from the uplink port on the Linksys > router to the 1st port on the cable router. We leave the > port right before the uplink port on the linksys port > empty (common knowledge item). > Ok here is the dilemma. All of the nodes that were on > the old cable modem/Linksys or Wan/Lan now boot > up and work flawlessly on the new topology. I.e. they > can see each other on the Lan "and" they can get out > thru the cable router uplink to the Wan internet. But > we have added two new nodes that were not on the > old system. The configure pretty much as expected in > setting up the network connection. One is a Compaq > the other is an Emachine, both run XPhome. However > the two new machines can see the Lan (and we can see > them) but they cannot see out thru the cable router uplink > to the internet. I've flushed the ipconfig caches, and rebooted > to exhaustion. These two refuse to see out. If I switch > data cables with two other nodes on the lan, then the nothing > changes, the two nodes that did not see Wan "still" do not > see Wan and the two that did see the Wan "still" see the > Wan even though they are in the same Lan hookup scenario > as the two that did not. We are at our wits end with these > two machines. We called a computer shop and they said > we should reload windows to reset everything. > Is there any other solution? > > |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I apologize for my ambiguity. I was specifically
wrong in my description and you were specifically correct in your statement about the modem. To correctly start over, it is an ISP provided cable router/modem. It has a coax out going to the cable hookup and it has 5 LAN ports and 1 uplink port. We have our nodes into the linksys and the linksys is uplinked from it's uplink port to the LAN_1 port on the ISP router/modem >Please post the model numbers of both devices. Linksys BEFSR81 CABLE/DSL ROUTER and Zyxel, Prestige 900 series is our ISP provided cable router/modem |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
From: "G" <NoMail@NoSpam>
| I apologize for my ambiguity. I was specifically | wrong in my description and you were specifically | correct in your statement about the modem. | To correctly start over, it is an ISP provided | cable router/modem. It has a coax out going to | the cable hookup and it has 5 LAN ports and | 1 uplink port. We have our nodes into the linksys | and the linksys is uplinked from it's uplink port to | the LAN_1 port on the ISP router/modem >> Please post the model numbers of both devices. | Linksys BEFSR81 CABLE/DSL ROUTER | and | Zyxel, Prestige 900 series is our ISP provided cable router/modem | OK. Then you don't need the BEFSR81 (BTW: That's what I use) what you need is just a 8 or more port Ethernet switch. The Prestige and teh Linksys Routers will cause configuration disfficulties because you are essentially using two Routers. Either you replace the Zyxel, Prestige 900 with a plain DOCSIS cable modem (not suggested unless you register it with the ISP) or you replace the Linksys BEFRS81 with a 8 or more port 10/100 Mb/s Ethernet switch (that's my suggestion). -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
>OK. Then you don't need the BEFSR81 (BTW:
>That's what I use) what you need is just a 8 or >more port Ethernet switch. The Prestige and the >Linksys Routers will cause configuration difficulties >because you are essentially using two Routers. >Either you replace the Zyxel, Prestige 900 with a >plain DOCSIS cable modem (not suggested unless >you register it with the ISP) or you replace the >Linksys BEFRS81 with a 8 or more port 10/100 >Mb/s Ethernet switch (that's my suggestion) ------------------------------------- I've wondered about that. I do have a extra 5 port linksys switch (not a router) in the cabinet. That would give me 4 ports with an uplink to the ISP router/modem which has 5 more (total) ports. I will try that first, if that doesn't work I will have to order a 8 to 10 port switch on the net since I've never found any here in town with that many ports at a retail outlet. There are some at specialty computer stores that are very expensive (having 20 to 50 ports). While I have your expertise here, can you tell me what some of the ramifications are when using two routers in a topo. Obviously this creates a sort of Wan within the Lan correct. Is there software (without spending a fortune) one can buy to manage such setups? Additionally I'm concerned about the ISP router working as a normal router since it's ports are labeled LAN-1, LAN-2 etc. It's almost as if it's a gateway between different switched hubs. But then from what I've seen so far that would be no different than a single node as long as no router was involved. Thanks much for your input. I'm a civil engineering cad draftsman by trade but elected as Net administrator at work since I know enough to be a hack of sorts but really I'm an amateur at Networking. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SUS 1.0/SP1 Approval Analyzer Tool Issue | Bobbie Harder \(MSFT\) | Windows Update | 0 | 01-05-2006 05:13 PM |
| IE Browser Connectivity Issue - (TCP/IP + Winsock) | Quenal | Windows XP Network Web | 0 | 01-05-2006 04:05 AM |
| Re: startup issue.... aaauuggghhhh | Frank | Windows XP General | 1 | 01-05-2006 02:31 AM |
| Re: Could this a mother board issue? | beb | Windows XP General | 0 | 01-05-2006 02:24 AM |
| Curious Hard Drive Issue | Manu | Windows XP Hardware | 10 | 01-05-2006 02:13 AM |