|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hello,
I suppose using Data Recovery tool - Partition Table Doctor or EASEUS DataRecoveryWizard. It is imho the best one among it's family. Easy to use and powerful. It actually never failed me before. Recommended! http://www.ptdd.com http://www.easeus.com/ -- Good work, Good day. "otitgurd@net.hr" wrote: > Few days ago I've installed xp pro ( without SP1,2...) on new > computer ( nForce4-4x + sata samsung 160gb + 20gb pata maxtor). > > The pata hdd has 3 fat32 partitions and it's connected as master > on 1st ide channel. > > The sata disk holds system and data partitions. > In the installation I've creted 2 partitions: > - ntfs C for xp ( 12GB) > - ntfs D for data ( less than 130GB) > The rest will be for linux, for now it stayed unpartitioned. > > Yesterday everything was working fine. > > Today i turn on the comp. and I see that I have lost > the D partition. > In fact there's a new D partition - that linux space now reported > as raw partition - xp just offers to format it. > In comp. management I can see my 130gb as unallocated. > > > Is there a way to restore data from that lost partition ? > > > > Neo > > > > PS. Here's report from Partition Magic 8: > > PowerQuest PartitionInfo 8.0 -- Windows NT/2000 Version > > > ================================================== ================================================== ======= > > ================================================== ================================================== ======= > Disk Geometry Information for Disk 2: 19457 Cylinders, 255 Heads, > 63 Sectors/Track > System PartSect # Boot BCyl Head Sect FS ECyl Head > Sect StartSect NumSects > ================================================== ================================================== ======= > 0 0 80 0 1 1 07 1023 254 > 63 63 24,579,387 > Info: End C,H,S values were large drive placeholders. > Actual values are: > 0 0 80 0 1 1 07 1529 254 63 63 > 24579387 > 0 1 00 1023 0 1 0F 1023 223 > 30 24,579,450 14,520,774 > Info: Begin C,H,S values were large drive placeholders. > Info: End C,H,S values were large drive placeholders. > Actual values are: > 0 1 00 1530 0 1 0F 2433 223 30 24579450 > 14520774 > Info: Partition didn't end on cylinder boundary. > ucEndHead expected to be 254, not 223. > Info: Partition didn't end on cylinder boundary. > ucEndSector expected to be 63, not 30. > 24,579,450 0 00 1023 1 1 07 1023 254 > 63 24,579,513 14,522,697 > Info: Begin C,H,S values were large drive placeholders. > Info: End C,H,S values were large drive placeholders. > Actual values are: > 24579450 0 00 1530 1 1 07 2433 254 63 24579513 > 14522697 > > > ================================================== ================================================== ======= > Partition Information for Disk 2: 152,625.3 Megabytes > Volume PartType Status Size MB PartSect # StartSect > TotalSects > ================================================== ================================================== ======= > C: NTFS Pri,Boot 12,001.7 0 0 63 > 24,579,387 > ExtendedX Pri 7,090.2 0 1 24,579,450 > 14,520,774 > EPBR Log 7,091.2 None -- 24,579,450 > 14,522,760 > Warning #113: EPBR partition starting at 24579450 overlaps extended > partition. > D: NTFS Log 7,091.2 24,579,450 0 24,579,513 > 14,522,697 > Error #113: Logical starting at 24579513 overlaps extended partition. > Unallocated Pri 133,532.5 None -- > 39,102,210 273,474,495 > > |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Boot and System partition on different drives | Dockland | Windows XP Setup Deployment | 2 | 01-05-2006 06:22 AM |
| Home Made Recovery Partition - Dual Boot XP and DOS | lessani@gmail.com | Windows XP Setup Deployment | 2 | 01-05-2006 06:16 AM |
| MBR Problem? Help? | Oh_no | Windows XP Setup Deployment | 5 | 01-05-2006 06:10 AM |
| No drive letter? Hidden partition? R. Urban help? | Dixonian69 | Windows XP Hardware | 6 | 01-05-2006 02:19 AM |
| crash during defragmentation: drive and partition lost | Harald ARNOLD | Windows XP Hardware | 3 | 01-05-2006 02:13 AM |