Windows Messenger 4.7.3001 vs 5.1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello all.

Will you excuse me if this has already been asked but...I am unable to
find out if there could be any reason to switching to Windows Messenger
5.1 from version 4.7.3001.

Assuming I am not prompted to doing it via microsoft update because
there aren't any security updates (do I guess right?) I wonder if I had
better switch to the newest version or keep the windows xp pro default
supplied one.

I hope you will be able solve my doubts :-)

Tia,

Stefano

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.47

iD8DBQFDvPW/tWeA8MqJcFYRAl2mAJ0R1nz+pPh46jOlbyLunYCCYl/aUgCfdkTc
OVs89x1VCdzKI5pZJKnPXpA=
=ZSSC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Stefano

Update Messenger to 5.1..

--
Mike Hall
MVP - Windows Shell/User


"Stefano Ferrante" <sorryIhate@spam.it.invalid> wrote in message
news:dpiskc$3000$1@newsreader2.mclink.it...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello all.
>
> Will you excuse me if this has already been asked but...I am unable to
> find out if there could be any reason to switching to Windows Messenger
> 5.1 from version 4.7.3001.
>
> Assuming I am not prompted to doing it via microsoft update because
> there aren't any security updates (do I guess right?) I wonder if I had
> better switch to the newest version or keep the windows xp pro default
> supplied one.
>
> I hope you will be able solve my doubts :-)
>
> Tia,
>
> Stefano
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.47
>
> iD8DBQFDvPW/tWeA8MqJcFYRAl2mAJ0R1nz+pPh46jOlbyLunYCCYl/aUgCfdkTc
> OVs89x1VCdzKI5pZJKnPXpA=
> =ZSSC
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>