|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have an old router, and all ports except 113 show up as "stealth",
except 113, which shows up as "closed". On TVs "call for help" they said that you should also have port 113 stealth, and said to get the latest firmware for your router to make it so. I have the latest firmware for my router, but it doesn't make port 113 stealthy. How important is it to make port 113 stealth as opposed to closed? Is it worth buying a new router to make it that way? --- Replace you know what by j to email |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 19:35:52 -0500, Jud McCranie <*email_address_deleted*>
wrote: >I have an old router, and all ports except 113 show up as "stealth", >except 113, which shows up as "closed". On TVs "call for help" they >said that you should also have port 113 stealth, and said to get the >latest firmware for your router to make it so. I have the latest >firmware for my router, but it doesn't make port 113 stealthy. > >How important is it to make port 113 stealth as opposed to closed? Is >it worth buying a new router to make it that way? Jud, Stealthing yourself is like hiding your head in the sand - it inconveniences you, and it doesn't make you safe. <http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/security-by-obscurity.html> http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/0...obscurity.html Layer your security - don't hide. <http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/please-protect-yourself-layer-your.html> http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/0...ayer-your.html -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 17:10:55 -0800, Chuck <none@example.net> wrote:
>Layer your security - don't hide. ><http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/please-protect-yourself-layer-your.html> I ran Scanit, and tries Jason's (the other link didn't work). Scanit found no problems. However, some popups were blocked.. Should I run these tests with or without a popup blocker? --- Replace you know what by j to email |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'll leave it to you whether you believe stealthiness is worthwhile. That
aside, if you want to stealth port 113 (or any other), there's no need to buy another router. Just use the port forwarding feature of your router to forward any requests on that port to a non-existent IP address on your network. Simple as that. Jim "Jud McCranie" <youknowwhat.mccranie@adelphia.net> wrote in message news:sd2dn1df5sibu2n1jhdnbt76olt5o43071@4ax.com... > I have an old router, and all ports except 113 show up as "stealth", > except 113, which shows up as "closed". On TVs "call for help" they > said that you should also have port 113 stealth, and said to get the > latest firmware for your router to make it so. I have the latest > firmware for my router, but it doesn't make port 113 stealthy. > > How important is it to make port 113 stealth as opposed to closed? Is > it worth buying a new router to make it that way? > --- > Replace you know what by j to email |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article <sd2dn1df5sibu2n1jhdnbt76olt5o43071@4ax.com>, Jud McCranie
<youknowwhat.mccranie@adelphia.net> wrote: >I have an old router, and all ports except 113 show up as "stealth", >except 113, which shows up as "closed". On TVs "call for help" they >said that you should also have port 113 stealth, and said to get the >latest firmware for your router to make it so. I have the latest >firmware for my router, but it doesn't make port 113 stealthy. > >How important is it to make port 113 stealth as opposed to closed? Is >it worth buying a new router to make it that way? Closed is fine -- don't buy a new router. In fact, Closed is better than Stealth on Port 113 in some cases, so some routers intentionally un-stealth it. See: http://grc.com/port_113.htm http://www.dshield.org/ports/port113.php http://www.hydrairc.com/wackowiki/Ident?show_files=1 -- Best Wishes, Steve Winograd, MS-MVP (Windows Networking) Please post any reply as a follow-up message in the news group for everyone to see. I'm sorry, but I don't answer questions addressed directly to me in E-mail or news groups. Microsoft Most Valuable Professional Program http://mvp.support.microsoft.com |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:30:13 -0700, "Steve Winograd [MVP]"
<bcmaven@mvps.org> wrote: >>How important is it to make port 113 stealth as opposed to closed? Is >>it worth buying a new router to make it that way? I thank you and the others for the information. --- Replace you know what by j to email |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| HTTP 1.1 persistent connection problem | a17763 | Outlook Express | 1 | 01-05-2006 04:48 PM |
| Firewall detects local Port access, but Port hasn't been forwarded by Router | iceman | Windows XP Network Web | 4 | 01-05-2006 04:08 AM |
| Remote assistance with alternate RDP port | Brian | Windows XP Network Web | 0 | 01-05-2006 04:04 AM |
| Port Reporter (PortRptr.exe) Genuine Windows download | Peter | Windows XP New Users | 2 | 01-05-2006 03:59 AM |
| USB Mass Storage Device - This device cannot start. (Code 10) | lobo201 | Windows XP Hardware | 11 | 01-05-2006 02:15 AM |