|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have a DSL connection into VPN router. I have two pcs (VPN-PC1 and
VPN-PC2) hanging off that for connection into my corporate lan. I attach a DLINK DI-624 wireless/eth router to the VPN router for my home network. On that network I have a wireless laptop, a wireless media player, a pc, and a Buffalo HD120 NAS. All PCs are running XP SP2. The VPN router assigns IPs in the range of: 154.153.142.30 - 154.153.142.50. The DLINK wl router assigns from 192.168.0.1 - 192.188.0.254. The devices behind the DLINK router can access resources on the two pcs behind the VPN router. The problem is I can't see into the wireless (DLINK) network from the VPN side. I would like to be able to have some limited access from the VPN (using VPN-PC1) side into the wireless side to do things like access shares on the NAS, control the Media player etc. I was thinking about adding another NIC to VPN-PC1 and linking into the DLINK via one of it's spare ethernet ports. From there I was thinking of using XPs bridging capabilities but I'm not sure if this is the right way to go. Specifically: 1) If I bridge the VPN side with the DLINK side, will I be opening up the resources on the DLINK side to the entire corporate LAN? (or will they remain hidden behind the firewall) 2) Does VPN-PC1 need to be on at all times once I set up a bridge? For the resources behind the DLINK router, I'd like them to work (connect to the Internet, see the shares on their side etc.) without having to keep VPN-PC1 turned on. 3) Since the DLINK assigns IPS at 192.168.0.1+, will that change once I enable the bridge, or will those resources still have the same range? I'd prefer not giving IPs in the same range as the corporate VPN IPs. Thanks for any input. -- TC |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|