Extending home LAN - retain current "backbone" or discard?


Go Back   Computer Help Articles > Windows XP Network Web
User Name
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-05-2006, 04:13 AM
Dazed
 
Posts: n/a
Default Extending home LAN - retain current "backbone" or discard?

At the moment we have a small network . . .an XP Home host (including
ICS out through a cable modem to the internet) and an ME client
connected by a crossover cable. At some point soon, I expect that
we'll be adding one or more laptops. We'll also want them incorporated
into the network, but that wireless is our most sensible connection.

As I see it, I've got two options:

1) Discard the current cable-based LAN and the three NIC cards, get a
wireless router, and "wireless cards" for the existing PCs, or
2) Retain the current LAN, add a "wireless card" (I'm sure there's
better terminology, my apologies) to the XP host, and extend the ICS
coverage to the new laptop(s).

I suspect that option "2)" is stupid, and that the cost of a brand-new
wireless network is worth it. Is my suspicion correct?

Thanks -

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-05-2006, 04:13 AM
Steve Winograd [MVP]
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Extending home LAN - retain current "backbone" or discard?

In article <1135710566.809861.320410@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
"Dazed" <kemps@optonline.net> wrote:
>At the moment we have a small network . . .an XP Home host (including
>ICS out through a cable modem to the internet) and an ME client
>connected by a crossover cable. At some point soon, I expect that
>we'll be adding one or more laptops. We'll also want them incorporated
>into the network, but that wireless is our most sensible connection.
>
>As I see it, I've got two options:
>
>1) Discard the current cable-based LAN and the three NIC cards, get a
>wireless router, and "wireless cards" for the existing PCs, or
>2) Retain the current LAN, add a "wireless card" (I'm sure there's
>better terminology, my apologies) to the XP host, and extend the ICS
>coverage to the new laptop(s).
>
>I suspect that option "2)" is stupid, and that the cost of a brand-new
>wireless network is worth it. Is my suspicion correct?
>
>Thanks -


A wireless router can share the cable modem connection between
multiple computers, using both wired and wireless connections. With
a router, you won't need to use ICS. Here's what I suggest:

1. Get a wireless router.

2. Disable ICS on the XP Home host.

3. Connect the cable modem to the router's WAN (Internet) port.

4. Connect the XP Home and ME computers to the router's LAN ports
using regular (not crossover) Ethernet cables.

You'll only need to add a wireless card if you have a laptop computer
that doesn't have wireless networking built in. Almost all current
laptop models have wireless networking built in.
--
Best Wishes,
Steve Winograd, MS-MVP (Windows Networking)

Please post any reply as a follow-up message in the news group
for everyone to see. I'm sorry, but I don't answer questions
addressed directly to me in E-mail or news groups.

Microsoft Most Valuable Professional Program
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BDD - ZTI.vbs error -2147467259 when connecting to AdminDB under WinPE nospam@area51.org.au Windows XP Setup Deployment 3 01-05-2006 03:59 PM
Windows XP Home Edition RIS Michael C Windows XP Setup Deployment 8 01-05-2006 06:22 AM
Last windows update broke my home network (file and print sharing) Ryan M Windows XP Network Web 3 01-05-2006 04:11 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO 2.3.2 © 2005, Crawlability, Inc.

Extending home LAN - retain current "backbone" or discard?