|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
In an idle moment (always dangerous) I thought I'd investigate the feature
of XP that allows one to group network interfaces to create a bridge. Partly because I'll soon have need of a wireless bridge between two LAN segments, and partly because I have two machines with 400Mb firewire built-in and a PCI firewire card - it might be nice to get a faster connection for free. So, with three ethernet NICs, a 54g wireless card, and a firewire card stuffed into PC [A] off we go - DCHP is provided by a broadband router to which [A] is connected via ethernet. All firewalls disabled. UPnP and UPnP SSDP services enabled (took me a while to figure that one out), all connections on [A] bridged. [A] gets an IP address from the router. Excellent. Connect [b] via ethernet to [A]. [b] gets an IP address from the router. Excellent. Disconnect ethernet. Connect [b] via firewire to [A]. Oh oh. [b] does not get an IP address. Damn. Set [b] to use a fixed IP - still it see the rest of the network. Change cables, change firewire port. Repeat the above on [C] - same result. So, has anyone here managed to have any success with a) bridges, b) networking with firewire? I'm not even going to start detailing the attempts at bridging using wireless - that's a story in itself and a much longer and tedious one. It's nice that bridging seems to work when it's all ethernet, but that's the one scenario that is of no actual use to me. -- /mel/ |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article <uGKQjOhDGHA.1676@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>, "/mel/"
<msnews@swinehood.kill.a.spammer.today.com> wrote: >In an idle moment (always dangerous) I thought I'd investigate the feature >of XP that allows one to group network interfaces to create a bridge. Partly >because I'll soon have need of a wireless bridge between two LAN segments, >and partly because I have two machines with 400Mb firewire built-in and a >PCI firewire card - it might be nice to get a faster connection for free. > >So, with three ethernet NICs, a 54g wireless card, and a firewire card >stuffed into PC [A] off we go - > >DCHP is provided by a broadband router to which [A] is connected via >ethernet. All firewalls disabled. UPnP and UPnP SSDP services enabled (took >me a while to figure that one out), all connections on [A] bridged. > >[A] gets an IP address from the router. Excellent. > >Connect [b] via ethernet to [A]. [b] gets an IP address from the router. >Excellent. Disconnect ethernet. > >Connect [b] via firewire to [A]. Oh oh. [b] does not get an IP address. >Damn. Set [b] to use a fixed IP - still it see the rest of the network. >Change cables, change firewire port. Repeat the above on [C] - same result. > >So, has anyone here managed to have any success with a) bridges, b) >networking with firewire? > >I'm not even going to start detailing the attempts at bridging using >wireless - that's a story in itself and a much longer and tedious one. > >It's nice that bridging seems to work when it's all ethernet, but that's the >one scenario that is of no actual use to me. This Microsoft Knowledge Base article could help: Bridge May Not Work With a Non-Promiscuous Mode Network Adapter http://support.microsoft.com/Default.aspx?id=302348 -- Best Wishes, Steve Winograd, MS-MVP (Windows Networking) Please post any reply as a follow-up message in the news group for everyone to see. I'm sorry, but I don't answer questions addressed directly to me in E-mail or news groups. Microsoft Most Valuable Professional Program http://mvp.support.microsoft.com |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Steve Winograd [MVP] wrote:
> In article <uGKQjOhDGHA.1676@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>, "/mel/" > <msnews@swinehood.kill.a.spammer.today.com> wrote: >> In an idle moment (always dangerous) I thought I'd investigate the >> feature of XP that allows one to group network interfaces to create >> a bridge. Partly because I'll soon have need of a wireless bridge >> between two LAN segments, and partly because I have two machines >> with 400Mb firewire built-in and a PCI firewire card - it might be >> nice to get a faster connection for free. >> >> So, with three ethernet NICs, a 54g wireless card, and a firewire >> card stuffed into PC [A] off we go - >> >> DCHP is provided by a broadband router to which [A] is connected via >> ethernet. All firewalls disabled. UPnP and UPnP SSDP services >> enabled (took me a while to figure that one out), all connections on >> [A] bridged. >> >> [A] gets an IP address from the router. Excellent. >> >> Connect [b] via ethernet to [A]. [b] gets an IP address from the >> router. Excellent. Disconnect ethernet. >> >> Connect [b] via firewire to [A]. Oh oh. [b] does not get an IP >> address. Damn. Set [b] to use a fixed IP - still it see the rest of >> the network. Change cables, change firewire port. Repeat the above >> on [C] - same result. >> >> So, has anyone here managed to have any success with a) bridges, b) >> networking with firewire? >> >> I'm not even going to start detailing the attempts at bridging using >> wireless - that's a story in itself and a much longer and tedious >> one. >> >> It's nice that bridging seems to work when it's all ethernet, but >> that's the one scenario that is of no actual use to me. > > This Microsoft Knowledge Base article could help: > > Bridge May Not Work With a Non-Promiscuous Mode Network Adapter > http://support.microsoft.com/Default.aspx?id=302348 Thanks for the tip. Unfortunately it didn't work - neither forcing the 1394 adapter into compatibility mode, nor forcing all of the adapters in the bridge into compatibility mode. Incidentally the 1394 adapters are using the standard XP OHCI drivers. The PCI card in the machine I wanted to use as a bridge is an Adaptec 4300, the motherboards with the built-in 1394 adapters use VIA and TI chipsets. I looked for other information from MS but all I could find were articles along the lines of "this is how to create a bridge, and it all works, isn't it marvellous". Oh well. I've wasted too much time on this already, so I've ordered gigabit ethernet NICs and hubs instead. It would have been nice to have gotten it working, especially as it seemed to work okay using ethernet. -- /mel/ np: silence |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Building an echo server | Nuno Magalhaes | Windows XP Messenger | 1 | 01-05-2006 07:48 AM |
| Network Bridge as load balancer | Burhanm | Windows XP Network Web | 0 | 01-05-2006 04:15 AM |
| Network Bridge (Strange Problem) | jamminc | Windows XP Network Web | 0 | 01-05-2006 04:03 AM |
| Building New Computer, Don’t want to format | Namasteshiva | Windows XP Hardware | 7 | 01-05-2006 02:23 AM |
| Set Network Bridge MAC address (Was: XP prefers ad-hoc ...) | Steven Whatley | Windows XP Hardware | 1 | 01-05-2006 02:13 AM |