Bridge building


Go Back   Computer Help Articles > Windows XP Network Web
User Name
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-05-2006, 04:14 AM
/mel/
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bridge building

In an idle moment (always dangerous) I thought I'd investigate the feature
of XP that allows one to group network interfaces to create a bridge. Partly
because I'll soon have need of a wireless bridge between two LAN segments,
and partly because I have two machines with 400Mb firewire built-in and a
PCI firewire card - it might be nice to get a faster connection for free.

So, with three ethernet NICs, a 54g wireless card, and a firewire card
stuffed into PC [A] off we go -

DCHP is provided by a broadband router to which [A] is connected via
ethernet. All firewalls disabled. UPnP and UPnP SSDP services enabled (took
me a while to figure that one out), all connections on [A] bridged.

[A] gets an IP address from the router. Excellent.

Connect [b] via ethernet to [A]. [b] gets an IP address from the router.
Excellent. Disconnect ethernet.

Connect [b] via firewire to [A]. Oh oh. [b] does not get an IP address.
Damn. Set [b] to use a fixed IP - still it see the rest of the network.
Change cables, change firewire port. Repeat the above on [C] - same result.

So, has anyone here managed to have any success with a) bridges, b)
networking with firewire?

I'm not even going to start detailing the attempts at bridging using
wireless - that's a story in itself and a much longer and tedious one.

It's nice that bridging seems to work when it's all ethernet, but that's the
one scenario that is of no actual use to me.


--

/mel/


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-05-2006, 04:14 AM
Steve Winograd [MVP]
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Bridge building

In article <uGKQjOhDGHA.1676@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>, "/mel/"
<msnews@swinehood.kill.a.spammer.today.com> wrote:
>In an idle moment (always dangerous) I thought I'd investigate the feature
>of XP that allows one to group network interfaces to create a bridge. Partly
>because I'll soon have need of a wireless bridge between two LAN segments,
>and partly because I have two machines with 400Mb firewire built-in and a
>PCI firewire card - it might be nice to get a faster connection for free.
>
>So, with three ethernet NICs, a 54g wireless card, and a firewire card
>stuffed into PC [A] off we go -
>
>DCHP is provided by a broadband router to which [A] is connected via
>ethernet. All firewalls disabled. UPnP and UPnP SSDP services enabled (took
>me a while to figure that one out), all connections on [A] bridged.
>
>[A] gets an IP address from the router. Excellent.
>
>Connect [b] via ethernet to [A]. [b] gets an IP address from the router.
>Excellent. Disconnect ethernet.
>
>Connect [b] via firewire to [A]. Oh oh. [b] does not get an IP address.
>Damn. Set [b] to use a fixed IP - still it see the rest of the network.
>Change cables, change firewire port. Repeat the above on [C] - same result.
>
>So, has anyone here managed to have any success with a) bridges, b)
>networking with firewire?
>
>I'm not even going to start detailing the attempts at bridging using
>wireless - that's a story in itself and a much longer and tedious one.
>
>It's nice that bridging seems to work when it's all ethernet, but that's the
>one scenario that is of no actual use to me.


This Microsoft Knowledge Base article could help:

Bridge May Not Work With a Non-Promiscuous Mode Network Adapter
http://support.microsoft.com/Default.aspx?id=302348
--
Best Wishes,
Steve Winograd, MS-MVP (Windows Networking)

Please post any reply as a follow-up message in the news group
for everyone to see. I'm sorry, but I don't answer questions
addressed directly to me in E-mail or news groups.

Microsoft Most Valuable Professional Program
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-05-2006, 04:15 AM
/mel/
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Bridge building

Steve Winograd [MVP] wrote:
> In article <uGKQjOhDGHA.1676@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>, "/mel/"
> <msnews@swinehood.kill.a.spammer.today.com> wrote:
>> In an idle moment (always dangerous) I thought I'd investigate the
>> feature of XP that allows one to group network interfaces to create
>> a bridge. Partly because I'll soon have need of a wireless bridge
>> between two LAN segments, and partly because I have two machines
>> with 400Mb firewire built-in and a PCI firewire card - it might be
>> nice to get a faster connection for free.
>>
>> So, with three ethernet NICs, a 54g wireless card, and a firewire
>> card stuffed into PC [A] off we go -
>>
>> DCHP is provided by a broadband router to which [A] is connected via
>> ethernet. All firewalls disabled. UPnP and UPnP SSDP services
>> enabled (took me a while to figure that one out), all connections on
>> [A] bridged.
>>
>> [A] gets an IP address from the router. Excellent.
>>
>> Connect [b] via ethernet to [A]. [b] gets an IP address from the
>> router. Excellent. Disconnect ethernet.
>>
>> Connect [b] via firewire to [A]. Oh oh. [b] does not get an IP
>> address. Damn. Set [b] to use a fixed IP - still it see the rest of
>> the network. Change cables, change firewire port. Repeat the above
>> on [C] - same result.
>>
>> So, has anyone here managed to have any success with a) bridges, b)
>> networking with firewire?
>>
>> I'm not even going to start detailing the attempts at bridging using
>> wireless - that's a story in itself and a much longer and tedious
>> one.
>>
>> It's nice that bridging seems to work when it's all ethernet, but
>> that's the one scenario that is of no actual use to me.

>
> This Microsoft Knowledge Base article could help:
>
> Bridge May Not Work With a Non-Promiscuous Mode Network Adapter
> http://support.microsoft.com/Default.aspx?id=302348


Thanks for the tip. Unfortunately it didn't work - neither forcing the 1394
adapter into compatibility mode, nor forcing all of the adapters in the
bridge into compatibility mode. Incidentally the 1394 adapters are using the
standard XP OHCI drivers. The PCI card in the machine I wanted to use as a
bridge is an Adaptec 4300, the motherboards with the built-in 1394 adapters
use VIA and TI chipsets.

I looked for other information from MS but all I could find were articles
along the lines of "this is how to create a bridge, and it all works, isn't
it marvellous".

Oh well. I've wasted too much time on this already, so I've ordered gigabit
ethernet NICs and hubs instead. It would have been nice to have gotten it
working, especially as it seemed to work okay using ethernet.
--

/mel/

np: silence


Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Building an echo server Nuno Magalhaes Windows XP Messenger 1 01-05-2006 07:48 AM
Network Bridge as load balancer Burhanm Windows XP Network Web 0 01-05-2006 04:15 AM
Network Bridge (Strange Problem) jamminc Windows XP Network Web 0 01-05-2006 04:03 AM
Building New Computer, Don’t want to format Namasteshiva Windows XP Hardware 7 01-05-2006 02:23 AM
Set Network Bridge MAC address (Was: XP prefers ad-hoc ...) Steven Whatley Windows XP Hardware 1 01-05-2006 02:13 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO 2.3.2 © 2005, Crawlability, Inc.

Bridge building