|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am stuck using a PC at work, and I have another question about how to fix something in XP that I've always taken for granted in OS X and OS 9 for that matter. When I double click a file in Windows Explorer to open the file, the file does not actually open, instead the application button in the task bar flashed orange until I click it, then I have to select the file I was trying to open, AND THEN it finally opens. Who's idea was it at MS not open a file that I double click? It is so frustrating that I even need to ask this question, but, here goes: How to I get files to open when I double click them in Windows XP? As far as I know, it has something to do with focus, which I know little about. Can someone PLEASE help me to get Windows to actaully open the flle - liek a normal OS - when I double-click it to OPEN the file? In the mean time I'll add this to the list of things that Windows XP lacks when compared to OS X (and OS 9 in some instances). Don't mean to rant, it's jsut ridiculous. P.S. Yes, I posted another similar topic to this a week or two ago, but I cannot remember the email address I registered with. See here if you're interested: http://tinyurl.com/9c7u4 Thanks, Jono -- Windoze |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Windoze wrote:
> I am stuck using a PC at work, and I have another question about how > to fix something in XP that I've always taken for granted in OS X and > OS 9 for that matter. When I double click a file in Windows Explorer > to open the file, the file does not actually open, instead the > application button in the task bar flashed orange until I click it, > then I have to select the file I was trying to open, AND THEN it > finally opens. Who's idea was it at MS not open a file that I double > click? It is so frustrating that I even need to ask this question, > but, here goes: > > How to I get files to open when I double click them in Windows XP? As > far as I know, it has something to do with focus, which I know little > about. Can someone PLEASE help me to get Windows to actaully open the > flle - liek a normal OS - when I double-click it to OPEN the file? > > In the mean time I'll add this to the list of things that Windows XP > lacks when compared to OS X (and OS 9 in some instances). Don't mean > to rant, it's jsut ridiculous. > > P.S. Yes, I posted another similar topic to this a week or two ago, > but I cannot remember the email address I registered with. > > See here if you're interested: > http://tinyurl.com/9c7u4 You (or someone else) had to change the default OR you are opeing a file that opens inside an application you already have open... Like double-clicking on a Word file when you have Word already opened and minimized to the system tray. Use TweakUI to allow your applications to Steal Focus if that is what you want. -- Shenan Stanley MS-MVP -- How To Ask Questions The Smart Way http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
PEBKAC
"Windoze" <Windoze.1wwn5x@pcbanter.net> wrote in message news:Windoze.1wwn5x@pcbanter.net... > > I am stuck using a PC at work, and I have another question about how to > fix something in XP that I've always taken for granted in OS X and OS 9 > for that matter. When I double click a file in Windows Explorer to open > the file, the file does not actually open, instead the application > button in the task bar flashed orange until I click it, then I have to > select the file I was trying to open, AND THEN it finally opens. Who's > idea was it at MS not open a file that I double click? It is so > frustrating that I even need to ask this question, but, here goes: > > How to I get files to open when I double click them in Windows XP? As > far as I know, it has something to do with focus, which I know little > about. Can someone PLEASE help me to get Windows to actaully open the > flle - liek a normal OS - when I double-click it to OPEN the file? > > In the mean time I'll add this to the list of things that Windows XP > lacks when compared to OS X (and OS 9 in some instances). Don't mean > to rant, it's jsut ridiculous. > > P.S. Yes, I posted another similar topic to this a week or two ago, > but I cannot remember the email address I registered with. > > See here if you're interested: > http://tinyurl.com/9c7u4 > > Thanks, > Jono > > > -- > Windoze |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
You (or someone else) had to change the default OR you are opeing a file that opens inside an application you already have open... Like double-clicking on a Word file when you have Word already opened and minimized to the system tray. Use TweakUI to allow your applications to Steal Focus if that is what you want. -- Shenan Stanley MS-MVP -- First of all, thank you for the quick "answer." Yes, I trying to open a file in an application that is already open. Secondly: If I double click a file, that means I want it to open, not sit in the task bar and flash. It's just plain ridiculous - number 3 on my rapidly growing list of things XP doesn't do that OS X does - that I have to install a thrid party application to simply open a file in Windows. I know that this thrid party app probably does something that is doable in XP alone (in regedit?), but too difficult for most to handle. I cannot believe that so many people put up with, or settle for, Window's lack of productivity, everyday. It seems so simple, you double click the file and it opens. Period. How hard is that? When I double click a file in OS X, hell OS 7.6 even, the file opens like it's suppsoed to, no matter the status of the application the file belongs to. Thanks again, -- Windoze |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Donny Broome Wrote:[color=blue] > PEBKAC > > > "Windoze" Windoze.1wwn5x@pcbanter.net wrote in message > news:Windoze.1wwn5x@pcbanter.net... > > PEBWAW is more like it. TweakUI does not bring back normal functionality, such as opening a file when it is double clicked if the application is already open. Under General< Focus, the only option is to "Prevent applications from stealing focus" which is what the problem is already. I want the application to "steal" focus when I double click a fiel that belongs to that application. Why would anybody in their right mind want the file to flash in the task bar when it is double clicked? How about an option to open the file when it is double clicked? What do I have to do/install in order to get Windows to open files I double click - even if their parent application is already open? Why can't Windows just open the application that owns the file I am trying to open? Is it possible to force the files I double click to open even if their application is already open? And why is that so difficult to begin with. Is this normal Windows behavior? -- Windoze |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
IS IT POSSIBLE TO FORCE THE FILES I DOUBLE CLICK TO OPEN EVEN IF THEIR APPLICATION IS ALREADY OPEN AND MINISMIZED? If TweakUI does it, can someone please clearly describe the procvess, I cannot seem to get it working. -- Windoze |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Windoze wrote:
> > IS IT POSSIBLE TO FORCE THE FILES I DOUBLE CLICK TO OPEN EVEN IF THEIR > APPLICATION IS ALREADY OPEN AND MINISMIZED? > > If TweakUI does it, can someone please clearly describe the procvess, > I cannot seem to get it working. > > It depends on how the application was coded. Malke -- Elephant Boy Computers www.elephantboycomputers.com "Don't Panic!" MS-MVP Windows - Shell/User |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Malke Wrote: > Windoze wrote: > It depends on how the application was coded. > All I want to do is have the file (any file) open when I double click on it, even if the application (any application) is minimized. This occurs naturally in Mac OS X (and all previous OSs on the Mac side) but I can't seem to get it working in Windoesn't XP. Apparently there is something known as "stealing focus" that I need to force upon all applications if I double click a file for that application. Why on earth wouldn't Windows open a file that you double click? It's obvious that I want it to open, and be useable, the second I double-click it, isn't it? The time that Windows wastes is soooooo frustrating. Any speed gains that PC hardware may have over Mac hardware is forfeited by Windows lack of productivity. Any help, if it is even possible, would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. -- Windoze |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Windoze wrote:
> > Malke Wrote: >> Windoze wrote: >> It depends on how the application was coded. >> > > > All I want to do is have the file (any file) open when I double click > on it, even if the application (any application) is minimized. This > occurs naturally in Mac OS X (and all previous OSs on the Mac side) > but I can't seem to get it working in Windoesn't XP. > > Apparently there is something known as "stealing focus" that I need to > force upon all applications if I double click a file for that > application. Why on earth wouldn't Windows open a file that you > double > click? It's obvious that I want it to open, and be useable, the > second I double-click it, isn't it? > > > The time that Windows wastes is soooooo frustrating. Any speed gains > that PC hardware may have over Mac hardware is forfeited by Windows > lack of productivity. > > Any help, if it is even possible, would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks. > > I don't know the answer to your question. I do know that some programs will open a second instance of themselves when a file is clicked and some won't. For instance, Firefox will open another in another window on another desktop for me. KNode will not but will just fail. So I really think the ability to do what you want doesn't have to do with the operating system but rather with the coding of the individual programs. If you are posting just to bitch about Windows, then go to one of the advocacy groups. Otherwise, you can check out tweaks by MVP Kelly Theriot regarding application focus here: http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/xp.htm Malke -- Elephant Boy Computers www.elephantboycomputers.com "Don't Panic!" MS-MVP Windows - Shell/User |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Windoze wrote:
> All I want to do is have the file (any file) open when I double click > on it, even if the application (any application) is minimized. This > occurs naturally in Mac OS X (and all previous OSs on the Mac side) > but I can't seem to get it working in Windoesn't XP. > > Apparently there is something known as "stealing focus" that I need to > force upon all applications if I double click a file for that > application. Why on earth wouldn't Windows open a file that you > double click? It's obvious that I want it to open, and be useable, > the second I double-click it, isn't it? > > > The time that Windows wastes is soooooo frustrating. Any speed gains > that PC hardware may have over Mac hardware is forfeited by Windows > lack of productivity. > > Any help, if it is even possible, would be greatly appreciated. I believe my Office 2003 works as you say you desire. Example to make sure: I have a Microsoft Word document already open. I minimize. I then locate another Word Document on my desktop and double-click on it.. It opens a new window on my desktop - the minimized document stays minimized. Excel is similar - same situation.. The only different is that the Excel window opens and contains all of the windows inside of one window - where Word has many windows open for each document.. In any case - the excel main window restores itself and the new file i double-clicked on is visible.. Is that what you are trying to do? (Yes - I have my "Prevent applications from stealing focus" enabled. Flash 3 times.) -- Shenan Stanley MS-MVP -- How To Ask Questions The Smart Way http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| .Net 1.1 Framework needed but do I need SP2 | Sara | Windows Update | 3 | 01-05-2006 05:11 PM |
| installed SP2, now get Quick Launch problem and Programs menu problem | Sentinel | Windows XP Customize | 18 | 01-05-2006 06:38 AM |
| System information | Steve | Windows XP Perform Maintain | 4 | 01-05-2006 06:05 AM |
| computer owner? | harry | Windows XP Security Admin | 1 | 01-05-2006 05:07 AM |
| whats the best pop up blocker | SarXBear80 | Windows XP Help and Support | 2 | 01-05-2006 02:46 AM |