|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I just installed xp64 on a new system with an AMD 64bit processor with 4 gigs
of matched dual channel memory. Both the bios and Windows report having just under 3 gigs of memory. Can anyone tell me why? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Have you looked in your motherboard manual for a possible explanation or the
board's website? I have a P4P800 which says that with 4GB installed the machine will report under 4 GB of installed memory because of resources taken by the chipset which I assume might mean address space. However, they say just a little bit is lost, you seem to have lost a lot. Could be you have a bad stick or it isn't 100% compatible with your system. I believe a dual-channel system will revert to single channel if it doesn't have matching sticks and if one is bad then it wouldn't think it had matching. Try them one at a time to see if they all work and try runnng a diagnostic like Memtest+ to see what it finds. Billh "Mikalele" <Mikalele@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:21BC0B1F-D796-482A-8D42-38297BFEA166@microsoft.com... >I just installed xp64 on a new system with an AMD 64bit processor with 4 >gigs > of matched dual channel memory. Both the bios and Windows report having > just > under 3 gigs of memory. Can anyone tell me why? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
In news:21BC0B1F-D796-482A-8D42-38297BFEA166@microsoft.com,
Mikalele <Mikalele@discussions.microsoft.com> had this to say: My reply is at the bottom of your sent message: > I just installed xp64 on a new system with an AMD 64bit processor > with 4 gigs of matched dual channel memory. Both the bios and Windows > report having just under 3 gigs of memory. Can anyone tell me why? I can't say for certain but it's worth noting that this applies to server systems. I haven't broken the 3 GB barrier yet - and have found that 2 GB suits all my needs so I actually have spare sticks kicking about - so I'm not 100% certain this applies to you. Not All Physical Memory May Be Reported By The Operating System: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555458/en-us?spid=3208 I'd take a look at that and consider giving Option A a short if B is not an option you can consider. The depth of the reasons behind it far exceeds my ability to comprehend so, if that's the problem, a firmware upgrade is your best choice. Flashing your BIOS would be the most logical first step assuming such is available and you have a reason behind it. If you can get by with 3 GB then so be it. I only recommend BIOS flashes (mostly because I am old-ish I suppose and remember the problems of yesteryear) when it's going to add either a feature or functionality that you absolutely can not live without. -- Galen - MS MVP - Windows (Shell/User & IE) http://dts-l.org/ "A man should keep his little brain attic stocked with all the furniture that he is likely to use, and the rest he can put away in the lumber-room of his library where he can get it if he wants it." Sherlock Holmes |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for the suggestions. As it turned out I had to first update the
chipset drivers and then update the bios. Now the bios and Windows see all 4 gigs of RAM. The mainboard is an ASUS A8N-E. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Update installation fails | Harold Cataquet | Windows Update | 23 | 01-05-2006 05:17 PM |
| IE6 Not display fonts correctly | David Gaguine | Internet Explorer 6 | 3 | 01-05-2006 04:20 PM |
| Transparent PNG doesn't display correctly in IE6 | M.Siler | Internet Explorer 6 | 1 | 01-05-2006 04:20 PM |
| Media Player 10 will not install / work correctly | Placks | Windows Media Player | 9 | 01-05-2006 04:18 PM |
| Removed spyware but now XP isn't working correctly | Chrissy | Windows XP Security Admin | 3 | 01-05-2006 05:39 AM |