|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have been getting a message at times when I try and send an email.
"To many users on the network" We have a network set up as peer to peer using windows XP pro on 6 computers and one XP home edition on 1 computer as well as 1 network printer, 1 Fax machine, and one copy machine connected to the system. Does anyone know if there is a limit as to how many workstations you can connect on a peer to peer system??? TonySper |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
TonySper wrote:
> I have been getting a message at times when I try and send an email. > "To many users on the network" We have a network set up as peer to > peer using windows XP pro on 6 computers and one XP home edition on 1 > computer as well as 1 network printer, 1 Fax machine, and one copy > machine connected to the system. Does anyone know if there is a limit > as to how many workstations you can connect on a peer to peer > system??? The limit is ten simultaneous connections for XP Professional, and five for XP Home. If all are simultaneously connected, you are apparently exceeding the limit on your XP Home machine. -- Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User Please reply to the newsgroup |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
TonySper wrote:
> I have been getting a message at times when I try and send an email. > "To many users on the network" We have a network set up as peer to > peer using windows XP pro on 6 computers and one XP home edition on > 1 computer as well as 1 network printer, 1 Fax machine, and one copy > machine connected to the system. Does anyone know if there is a > limit as to how many workstations you can connect on a peer to peer > system??? "Where" do you get this message? Is it a Windows Popup or is it something you are getting back via email message? -- Shenan Stanley MS-MVP -- How To Ask Questions The Smart Way http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks Ken. Strange as we have been using the system for 5 years and
were on windows 98 for a while with no problems but we have added the printer and fax machine. TonySper "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message news:%23LRCcUpAGHA.916@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... TonySper wrote: > I have been getting a message at times when I try and send an email. > "To many users on the network" We have a network set up as peer to > peer using windows XP pro on 6 computers and one XP home edition on > 1 > computer as well as 1 network printer, 1 Fax machine, and one copy > machine connected to the system. Does anyone know if there is a > limit > as to how many workstations you can connect on a peer to peer > system??? The limit is ten simultaneous connections for XP Professional, and five for XP Home. If all are simultaneously connected, you are apparently exceeding the limit on your XP Home machine. -- Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User Please reply to the newsgroup |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Inbound connections limit in Windows XP
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;314882 -- Carey Frisch Microsoft MVP Windows XP - Shell/User "TonySper" wrote: > I have been getting a message at times when I try and send an email. > "To many users on the network" We have a network set up as peer to > peer using windows XP pro on 6 computers and one XP home edition on 1 > computer as well as 1 network printer, 1 Fax machine, and one copy > machine connected to the system. Does anyone know if there is a limit > as to how many workstations you can connect on a peer to peer > system??? > TonySper > > > |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"TonySper" <tsperduti@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:fhJof.747$aS5.276@bignews4.bellsouth.net > Thanks Ken. Strange as we have been using the system for 5 years and > were on windows 98 for a while with no problems but we have added the > printer and fax machine. > TonySper > > "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message > news:%23LRCcUpAGHA.916@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > TonySper wrote: > >> I have been getting a message at times when I try and send an email. >> "To many users on the network" We have a network set up as peer to >> peer using windows XP pro on 6 computers and one XP home edition on >> 1 >> computer as well as 1 network printer, 1 Fax machine, and one copy >> machine connected to the system. Does anyone know if there is a >> limit >> as to how many workstations you can connect on a peer to peer >> system??? > > > > The limit is ten simultaneous connections for XP Professional, and > five for > XP Home. If all are simultaneously connected, you are apparently > exceeding > the limit on your XP Home machine. The printer and FAX probably each count as an additional network connection. -- Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE Please respond in Newsgroup only. Do not send email http://www.fjsmjs.com Protect your PC http://www.microsoft.com./athome/sec...t/default.aspx http://defendingyourmachine.blogspot.com/ |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Carey,
If I am reading this correctly I believe it means that any ONE computer cannot have more than 5 computers connected to it at one time if it is XP home and any ONE computer cannot have more than 10 computers connected to it at one time if it is XP pro. My question should have been "What is the limit to how many computers can be connected to the LAN at any one time?" Most of the time the workstations are on the internet and only communicate with the server at a limited periods. Does this 5 and 10 minute limit pertain as to how many can be on a workgroup at any one time?? TonySper "Carey Frisch [MVP]" <mrxp2004@nospamyahoo.com> wrote in message news:95DCE928-88B3-40FB-A69F-3586F2247E8D@microsoft.com... Inbound connections limit in Windows XP http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;314882 -- Carey Frisch Microsoft MVP Windows XP - Shell/User "TonySper" wrote: > I have been getting a message at times when I try and send an email. > "To many users on the network" We have a network set up as peer to > peer using windows XP pro on 6 computers and one XP home edition on > 1 > computer as well as 1 network printer, 1 Fax machine, and one copy > machine connected to the system. Does anyone know if there is a > limit > as to how many workstations you can connect on a peer to peer > system??? > TonySper > > > |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
TonySper wrote:
> Carey, > If I am reading this correctly I believe it means that any ONE > computer cannot have more than 5 computers connected to it at one time > if it is XP home and any ONE computer cannot have more than 10 > computers connected to it at one time if it is XP pro. My question > should have been "What is the limit to how many computers can be > connected to the LAN at any one time?" Most of the time the > workstations are on the internet and only communicate with the server > at a limited periods. Does this 5 and 10 minute limit pertain as to > how many can be on a workgroup at any one time?? > TonySper I'm not Carey, but... The limitation is for *connections*, not *computers*. This is an important distinction because one *computer* will ordinarily make more than one *connection* to another computer. The inbound connections limitation has nothing to do with how many computers are on a peer-to-peer (non-domain) network. It has to do with how many *connections* are being made to one particular computer at a time. This is a common occurrence in small businesses where the company will use a Windows XP Pro (or occasionally XP Home) computer as a "file server" or a "server" hosting specialized niche software. From a computer management perspective, if a company has more than 10 or so computers, they should be using a domain anyway. I don't know what you are using the "server" computer for, but it sounds like you need to either put a MS server operating system on it OR if it is not actively running software that will only work on Windows (just doing file/print-serving) you could install Linux on it which has no inbound connection limitation. Malke -- MS-MVP Windows User/Shell Elephant Boy Computers www.elephantboycomputers.com "Don't Panic" |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Malke,
Thanks for clearing me on that. Yes I think it is about time to switch to maybe a true server. I cleared most of the problems by just not sharing the printer. Each workstation has there own printer and are not using the server printer anyway. It would be very rare to have more than 9 workstations connected to any one computer but it did happen when we connected up a couple of test workstations and left them connected to the server. Live and learn. Most all the programs here are windows so have to stay with XP for now. TonySper "Malke" <notreally@invalid.com> wrote in message news:uSE2eKDBGHA.3624@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... TonySper wrote: > Carey, > If I am reading this correctly I believe it means that any ONE > computer cannot have more than 5 computers connected to it at one > time > if it is XP home and any ONE computer cannot have more than 10 > computers connected to it at one time if it is XP pro. My question > should have been "What is the limit to how many computers can be > connected to the LAN at any one time?" Most of the time the > workstations are on the internet and only communicate with the > server > at a limited periods. Does this 5 and 10 minute limit pertain as to > how many can be on a workgroup at any one time?? > TonySper I'm not Carey, but... The limitation is for *connections*, not *computers*. This is an important distinction because one *computer* will ordinarily make more than one *connection* to another computer. The inbound connections limitation has nothing to do with how many computers are on a peer-to-peer (non-domain) network. It has to do with how many *connections* are being made to one particular computer at a time. This is a common occurrence in small businesses where the company will use a Windows XP Pro (or occasionally XP Home) computer as a "file server" or a "server" hosting specialized niche software. From a computer management perspective, if a company has more than 10 or so computers, they should be using a domain anyway. I don't know what you are using the "server" computer for, but it sounds like you need to either put a MS server operating system on it OR if it is not actively running software that will only work on Windows (just doing file/print-serving) you could install Linux on it which has no inbound connection limitation. Malke -- MS-MVP Windows User/Shell Elephant Boy Computers www.elephantboycomputers.com "Don't Panic" |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
TonySper wrote:
> Malke, > Thanks for clearing me on that. Yes I think it is about time to switch > to maybe a true server. I cleared most of the problems by just not > sharing the printer. Each workstation has there own printer and are > not using the server printer anyway. It would be very rare to have > more than 9 workstations connected to any one computer but it did > happen when we connected up a couple of test workstations and left > them connected to the server. Live and learn. Most all the programs > here are windows so have to stay with XP for now. You're welcome, Tony. You don't have to get elaborate with Server, but don't let it intimidate you either. Windows Server 2003 is really very nice and easy to set up. Look at the Small Business Server edition. Malke -- Elephant Boy Computers www.elephantboycomputers.com "Don't Panic!" MS-MVP Windows - Shell/User |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Re: Printer only 'connects' for administrator users. | Steve Hawkins | Windows XP Print Fax | 4 | 01-05-2006 06:42 AM |
| Re: XPSP2 domain firewall settings | Anthony Yates | Windows XP Security Admin | 1 | 01-05-2006 04:16 AM |
| Network settings altered after connecting to outside wireless netw | solarwnz | Windows XP Network Web | 3 | 01-05-2006 04:15 AM |
| XP Home 5 user limit on shared network resource | JR | Windows XP Network Web | 7 | 01-05-2006 04:04 AM |
| Long delay before Drives & Files appear in My Computer & Address Bar | shizzlenizzlator@gmail.com | Windows XP Help and Support | 3 | 01-05-2006 02:44 AM |