Fatal error installing XP home..... Micorsoft.... what a suprise.


Go Back   Computer Help Articles > Windows XP New Users
User Name
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-05-2006, 03:58 AM
stevek
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fatal error installing XP home..... Micorsoft.... what a suprise.

Upgrading 98 to XP. Running Upgrade report list (potential hardware and
software issues). App stops with Fatal Error: Setup cannot continue.
Contact Microsoft Technical Support. (Error 5B6FF5Ch)

Any ideas?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-05-2006, 03:58 AM
Malke
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Fatal error installing XP home..... Micorsoft.... what a suprise.

stevek wrote:

> Upgrading 98 to XP. Running Upgrade report list (potential hardware
> and software issues). App stops with Fatal Error: Setup cannot
> continue. Contact Microsoft Technical Support. (Error 5B6FF5Ch)
>
> Any ideas?


My idea is that if the Upgrade Advisor freezes, your machine is probably
not a good candidate for XP. What are its specs?

Malke
--
Elephant Boy Computers
www.elephantboycomputers.com
"Don't Panic!"
MS-MVP Windows - Shell/User
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-05-2006, 03:58 AM
stevek
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Fatal error installing XP home..... Micorsoft.... what a suprise.

Changed drive which helped somewhat. Got the XP loaded but it still is
hitting the CPU hard. 20 processes and keeps the CPU at 20%. It is not a
memory or disk issue but a CPU issue (seems to me). Same system has been
an NT server with oracle, NT workstation and 2003 test server with
absolutely no problems. Seems very funny that XP needs so much CPU to
stand still. During a copy ..... geez you'd think I had oracle running
with 10 users hitting it hard. What is XP doing with all this CPU resource?



Malke wrote:

> stevek wrote:
>
>
>>Upgrading 98 to XP. Running Upgrade report list (potential hardware
>>and software issues). App stops with Fatal Error: Setup cannot
>>continue. Contact Microsoft Technical Support. (Error 5B6FF5Ch)
>>
>>Any ideas?

>
>
> My idea is that if the Upgrade Advisor freezes, your machine is probably
> not a good candidate for XP. What are its specs?
>
> Malke

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-05-2006, 03:58 AM
Malke
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Fatal error installing XP home..... Micorsoft.... what a suprise.

stevek wrote:

> Changed drive which helped somewhat. Got the XP loaded but it still is
> hitting the CPU hard. 20 processes and keeps the CPU at 20%. It is not
> a memory or disk issue but a CPU issue (seems to me). Same system has
> been an NT server with oracle, NT workstation and 2003 test server
> with absolutely no problems. Seems very funny that XP needs so much
> CPU to stand still. During a copy ..... geez you'd think I had oracle
> running with 10 users hitting it hard. What is XP doing with all this
> CPU resource?


Well, since you didn't tell us what processor you have and how much RAM
it's hard to say. Normally you don't run a lot of programs on a server
and NT4 was a really long time ago. Here are some links to help you
trim the services:

http://www.blackviper.com/
http://www.theeldergeek.com/services_guide.htm

Do some clean-boot troubleshooting to limit what is starting up with
Windows, too:

Clean Boot - http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=310353
and How to Troubleshoot By Using the Msconfig Utility in Windows XP -
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=310560

Turn off a lot of eye candy. Do this from the Advanced tab in System
applet for appearance.

Malke
--
Elephant Boy Computers
www.elephantboycomputers.com
"Don't Panic!"
MS-MVP Windows - Shell/User
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-05-2006, 03:58 AM
stevek
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Fatal error installing XP home..... Micorsoft.... what a suprise.

Sorry, sometimes when people are in a hurry..... anyway, CPU 500MHZ and
RAM 512M. Should be fine, within published min and as previously stated,
servers worked fine with same. Will try you suggestions.


Malke wrote:

> stevek wrote:
>
>
>>Changed drive which helped somewhat. Got the XP loaded but it still is
>>hitting the CPU hard. 20 processes and keeps the CPU at 20%. It is not
>>a memory or disk issue but a CPU issue (seems to me). Same system has
>>been an NT server with oracle, NT workstation and 2003 test server
>>with absolutely no problems. Seems very funny that XP needs so much
>>CPU to stand still. During a copy ..... geez you'd think I had oracle
>>running with 10 users hitting it hard. What is XP doing with all this
>>CPU resource?

>
>
> Well, since you didn't tell us what processor you have and how much RAM
> it's hard to say. Normally you don't run a lot of programs on a server
> and NT4 was a really long time ago. Here are some links to help you
> trim the services:
>
> http://www.blackviper.com/
> http://www.theeldergeek.com/services_guide.htm
>
> Do some clean-boot troubleshooting to limit what is starting up with
> Windows, too:
>
> Clean Boot - http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=310353
> and How to Troubleshoot By Using the Msconfig Utility in Windows XP -
> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=310560
>
> Turn off a lot of eye candy. Do this from the Advanced tab in System
> applet for appearance.
>
> Malke

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-05-2006, 03:58 AM
Malke
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Fatal error installing XP home..... Micorsoft.... what a suprise.

stevek wrote:

> Sorry, sometimes when people are in a hurry..... anyway, CPU 500MHZ
> and RAM 512M. Should be fine, within published min and as previously
> stated, servers worked fine with same. Will try you suggestions.


Yes, you're right. It will not be a speed demon but should be just fine.
Do the services/startup troubleshooting and turn off the eye candy. Use
the classic gui. Post back with results if you need more help.

Malke
--
Elephant Boy Computers
www.elephantboycomputers.com
"Don't Panic!"
MS-MVP Windows - Shell/User
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-05-2006, 03:58 AM
stevek
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Fatal error installing XP home..... Micorsoft.... what a suprise.

By eye candy you mean?

I am using the classic. Will look at other suggestions from the sites
you listed.

What seems strange to me after studying Windows Task Manager is that it
seems to have more than enough memory and disk space but the CPU is
strapped. Any copy function puts CPU at 100% and CPU sits at 20-25% at
idle. Strange.


Malke wrote:

> stevek wrote:
>
>
>>Sorry, sometimes when people are in a hurry..... anyway, CPU 500MHZ
>>and RAM 512M. Should be fine, within published min and as previously
>>stated, servers worked fine with same. Will try you suggestions.

>
>
> Yes, you're right. It will not be a speed demon but should be just fine.
> Do the services/startup troubleshooting and turn off the eye candy. Use
> the classic gui. Post back with results if you need more help.
>
> Malke

Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Update installation fails Harold Cataquet Windows Update 23 01-05-2006 05:17 PM
Re: Error number 0x8000711 kcress Windows Update 0 01-05-2006 05:11 PM
Windows XP Home Edition RIS Michael C Windows XP Setup Deployment 8 01-05-2006 06:22 AM
Last windows update broke my home network (file and print sharing) Ryan M Windows XP Network Web 3 01-05-2006 04:11 AM
Access denied when trying to connect to XP Pro from XP Home Abrasha Windows XP Network Web 4 01-05-2006 04:07 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO 2.3.2 © 2005, Crawlability, Inc.

Fatal error installing XP home..... Micorsoft.... what a suprise.