|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Replying on the memory math: It may be that your video Ram is actually 'on
board' and therefore taken from your available system Ram (Example" 256 MB Ram - 32MB Video Ram = 224MB 'available'). This is my situation with my Compaq R3060 Laptop. It takes 64MB from EACH of 2 x 256MB memory sticks, so my 512MB actually works out to 383MB available, grrr... but I hope this helped :-) "Michael" wrote: > With that 224MB RAM you cannot get a lot of speed - don't see how you got > 224MB, 32+64+128? > Also, it's not clear if only the Internet connection is slow (modem, ISP, > phone line etc) or the whole system? > All in all, on a system like that, it takes about 2 hours to do a clean > install of XP+SP2 - better slipstream SP2 in XP. > Michael > > "hfmedia" <hfmedia@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:CF6EC672-C9AE-42E4-B839-62DE79F4E6E8@microsoft.com... > > I'm in the same boat too. Came here hoping to find some answers. I'll > > keep > > looking through the posts, but thought I'd put my info in here as well. > > I've > > been slow about two weeks also. Couldn't open any web pages because they > > kept > > timing out. Everything just seemed to start getting slower and slower. > > > > I did install the windows pack 2 in this time range. I also installed > > Norton Internet 2004 even more recently (I had Norton but it was out of > > date) > > thinking there might be a problem with a virus. It said there was no > > problem. Things just seemed to get even slower though. > > > > I decided to try and restore my computer to an earlier time. It kept > > failing. Then I looked for an answer to that. I read somewhere that > > restore > > would't let me go back to a time when I had a virus. SO I thought that > > might > > be the reason I couldn't restore. > > > > Things didn't get better and I decided to take Norton off because I > > thought > > it might be two conflicting firewalls (I did turn off the Windows > > firewall. > > but thought there might be another somewhere on my computer or something > > else > > with Norton making things even slower. After doing that I could get to > > some > > webpages where I couldn't go previously, so maybe Norton was part of the > > deal. But still no speed. > > > > Even hitting reply to this page seemed to take about ten seconds. And I > > don;t have Norton on my computer even now. I have a Compaq presario > > 6010US > > AMD XP 1600+ 1.4 GHz, 224 MB ram > > > > I think I will put norton back on and see if I can tweak it to allow the > > pages I want to open. I want to be protected. I guess it wasn't Norton > > either since things are stil slow. Could it be the pack 2? It didn't > > seem > > to correlate exactly with that, but it was within a week of that it > > started > > slowing, which was right when I put on Norton. Sorry to ramble. > > > |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Windows XP service pack 2 | Bionca | Windows Update | 2 | 01-05-2006 05:08 PM |
| Are security updates available for saving to CD | Ian Ferrin | Windows XP Setup Deployment | 3 | 01-05-2006 06:22 AM |
| Slipstreaming | Eric Fehlhaber | Windows XP Setup Deployment | 5 | 01-05-2006 06:22 AM |
| Windows Loging off TOO SLOWLY | MehradSys | Windows XP Perform Maintain | 1 | 01-05-2006 05:48 AM |
| Is Windows xp sp2 Firewall good enough? | Jeff | Windows XP Security Admin | 5 | 01-05-2006 04:27 AM |