|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
if we view images on a website or open image attachments we could get spyware
etc through this WMF vulnerability. I'm not sure what they mean by view images on a website?? Every website has images basically. Can someone explain this? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
2pak wrote:
> if we view images on a website or open image attachments we could get spyware > etc through this WMF vulnerability. > > I'm not sure what they mean by view images on a website?? Every website has > images basically. <snip!> Exactly. That's one reason this bug is kind of scary. If you look at the source code behind a simple web page, for every picture you'll see a line that says "img src", and points to a file. Your browser reads that code and finds and opens the file (picture) for you. When you look at a web page, you're usually looking at the contents of more than one file. If the "picture" file has wmf code in it, the browser will still try to open the pic for you - and end up executing the wmf code. Thumbnail view does the same thing. So does viewing inline attachments in an email message. -- ~ Rosanne Don’t save my sneakemail address – when it gets spammed, it gets changed. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
2pak wrote:
> if we view images on a website or open image attachments we could get spyware > etc through this WMF vulnerability. > > I'm not sure what they mean by view images on a website?? Every website has > images basically. <snip!> Exactly. That's one reason this bug is kind of scary. If you look at the source code behind a simple web page, for every picture you'll see a line that says "img src", and points to a file. Your browser reads that code and finds and opens the file (picture) for you. When you look at a web page, you're usually looking at the contents of more than one file. If the "picture" file has wmf code in it, the browser will still try to open the pic for you - and end up executing the wmf code. Thumbnail view does the same thing. So does viewing inline attachments in an email message. -- ~ Rosanne Don’t save my sneakemail address – when it gets spammed, it gets changed. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
A remote code execution security issue has been identified
in the Graphics Rendering Engine that could allow an attacker to remotely compromise your Windows-based system and gain control over it: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS06-001 Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could Allow Remote Code Execution (912919) http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sec.../ms06-001.mspx Security Update for Windows XP (KB912919) http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en -- Carey Frisch Microsoft MVP Windows XP - Shell/User "2pak" wrote: > if we view images on a website or open image attachments we could get spyware > etc through this WMF vulnerability. > > I'm not sure what they mean by view images on a website?? Every website has > images basically. Can someone explain this? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Microsoft Security Advisory (912840): Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could Allow Remote Code Execution | PA Bear | Internet Explorer 6 | 33 | 01-05-2006 04:38 PM |
| Re: Microsoft Security Advisory (912840): Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could Allow Remote Code Execution | PA Bear | Windows XP General | 0 | 01-05-2006 02:29 AM |
| Re: Microsoft Security Advisory (912840): Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could Allow Remote Code Execution | PA Bear | Windows XP General | 9 | 01-05-2006 02:28 AM |
| Re: Microsoft Security Advisory (912840): Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could Allow Remote Code Execution | Kerry Brown | Windows XP General | 1 | 01-05-2006 02:25 AM |
| Re: Microsoft Security Advisory (912840): Vulnerability in Graphic | Tom [Pepper] Willett | Windows XP General | 0 | 01-05-2006 02:24 AM |