|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi
We build our PCs using RIS and the last part in to run a batch file that installs all the latest patches. This is to ensure that the PC is secure before SMS "kicks in". Everything was working fine but recently I have noticed that a few patches are installing without error, creating the registry keys and the backup files but the actual file version is not being updated (This is being detected in MBSA). I am running XP SP2 and the files are setup in the batch file as per Microsofts instructions to install multiple updates with only one reboot. The files are installed in order, eg. MS05-050, MS05-051... If I install the patches manully using the same switches it installs fine, so I assume something is wrong with the updates installing the latest version of a DLL. Has anyone seen this before? Many thanks Kieron |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kieron wrote:
> Hi > We build our PCs using RIS and the last part in to run a batch file that > installs all the latest patches. This is to ensure that the PC is secure > before SMS "kicks in". Everything was working fine but recently I have > noticed that a few patches are installing without error, creating the > registry keys and the backup files but the actual file version is not being > updated (This is being detected in MBSA). I am running XP SP2 and the files > are setup in the batch file as per Microsofts instructions to install > multiple updates with only one reboot. The files are installed in order, eg. > MS05-050, MS05-051... If I install the patches manully using the same > switches it installs fine, so I assume something is wrong with the updates > installing the latest version of a DLL. Has anyone seen this before? > Many thanks > > Kieron Hi, What are the update numbers this happens for, and what DLLs aren't updated? -- torgeir, Microsoft MVP Scripting, Porsgrunn Norway Administration scripting examples and an ONLINE version of the 1328 page Scripting Guide: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/scr...r/default.mspx |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
hi
the patches are (All MS05): 032 agentdpv.dll. I have 2.0.0.3422 installed. Should be 2.0.0.3423 036 mscms.dll I have 5.1.2600.2180 installed. Should be 5.1.2600.2709 040 tapisrv.dll I have 5.1.2600.2180 installed. Should be 5.1.2600.2716 042 kerberos.dll I have 5.1.2600.2180 installed. Should be 5.1.2600.2698 043 spoolssv.exe I have 5.1.2600.2180 installed. Should be 5.1.2600.2696 051 catsrv.dll I have 2001.12.4414.258 installed. Should be 2001.12.4414.308 052 browseui.dll I have 6.0.2900.2180 installed. Should be 6.0.2900.2753. What is also odd in the case of MS05-052 is that I also install MS05-020,MS05-025 and MS05-038 which should ALL increse the version of browseui.dll to more than 2180! thanks Kieron "Torgeir Bakken (MVP)" wrote: > Kieron wrote: > > > Hi > > We build our PCs using RIS and the last part in to run a batch file that > > installs all the latest patches. This is to ensure that the PC is secure > > before SMS "kicks in". Everything was working fine but recently I have > > noticed that a few patches are installing without error, creating the > > registry keys and the backup files but the actual file version is not being > > updated (This is being detected in MBSA). I am running XP SP2 and the files > > are setup in the batch file as per Microsofts instructions to install > > multiple updates with only one reboot. The files are installed in order, eg. > > MS05-050, MS05-051... If I install the patches manully using the same > > switches it installs fine, so I assume something is wrong with the updates > > installing the latest version of a DLL. Has anyone seen this before? > > Many thanks > > > > Kieron > Hi, > > What are the update numbers this happens for, and what DLLs > aren't updated? > > > -- > torgeir, Microsoft MVP Scripting, Porsgrunn Norway > Administration scripting examples and an ONLINE version of > the 1328 page Scripting Guide: > http://www.microsoft.com/technet/scr...r/default.mspx > |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|