|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi,
if I install an XP on a Multiprocessor machine (that has HT), and take a image, could I use the same image on other types of computers, e.g. processors that aren't HT? so it would auto install the correct HAL for that type of computer? I tried a few things, that has been listed on microsoft, and other forums... but none of them are working. or do I have to create different images for different HAL configurations? thanks in advanced, Peter |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
HAL options after Windows XP Setup
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=309283 Running Sysprep http://www.microsoft.com/resources/d...c_cai_ussz.asp How to use the Sysprep tool to automate successful deployment of Windows XP http://support.microsoft.com/default...302577&sd=tech -- Carey Frisch Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User Microsoft Community Newsgroups news://msnews.microsoft.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Peter Lawlor" wrote: | Hi, | | if I install an XP on a Multiprocessor machine (that has HT), and take a | image, could I use the same image on other types of computers, e.g. | processors that aren't HT? | | so it would auto install the correct HAL for that type of computer? | | I tried a few things, that has been listed on microsoft, and other forums... | but none of them are working. | | or do I have to create different images for different HAL configurations? | | | thanks in advanced, | Peter |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Switching HALs is really not supported by Microsoft, however a few
customer are doing this and it works well as long as you have controll of which hardware you purchase...(some hardware just doesnt work well with HAL replacments routines, but most hardware do) The procedure I've seen customers doing is to create their master image of a ACPI Uniprocessor machine and use that image on Multiprocessor machines as well. The line in sysprep.inf looks like this: UpdateUPHAL="ACPIAPIC_MP,C:\windows\Inf\Hal.inf" I know of a customer in Sweden that has about 20 000 computers, and one single image (Which I think is so cool) and they use the above procedure. regards Johan Arwidmark Microsoft MVP - Setup/Deployment On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 03:46:08 -0800, Peter Lawlor <PeterLawlor@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: >Hi, > >if I install an XP on a Multiprocessor machine (that has HT), and take a >image, could I use the same image on other types of computers, e.g. >processors that aren't HT? > >so it would auto install the correct HAL for that type of computer? > >I tried a few things, that has been listed on microsoft, and other forums... >but none of them are working. > >or do I have to create different images for different HAL configurations? > > >thanks in advanced, >Peter |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oh, thanks alot.
that worked, APART from one tiny little thing. I have to log in, as admin so it would install the multiprocessor configuration, then restart the computer... I really hope i dont have to do this, to each computer... (I know I dont have 20k computers, but I work in a department, within the unversity of sheffield in UK, and having 200+ computers) thanks Peter Lawlor "Johan Arwidmark" wrote: > Switching HALs is really not supported by Microsoft, however a few > customer are doing this and it works well as long as you have controll > of which hardware you purchase...(some hardware just doesnt work well > with HAL replacments routines, but most hardware do) > > The procedure I've seen customers doing is to create their master > image of a ACPI Uniprocessor machine and use that image on > Multiprocessor machines as well. > > The line in sysprep.inf looks like this: > UpdateUPHAL="ACPIAPIC_MP,C:\windows\Inf\Hal.inf" > > I know of a customer in Sweden that has about 20 000 computers, and > one single image (Which I think is so cool) and they use the above > procedure. > > > regards > > Johan Arwidmark > Microsoft MVP - Setup/Deployment > > > > On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 03:46:08 -0800, Peter Lawlor > <PeterLawlor@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >if I install an XP on a Multiprocessor machine (that has HT), and take a > >image, could I use the same image on other types of computers, e.g. > >processors that aren't HT? > > > >so it would auto install the correct HAL for that type of computer? > > > >I tried a few things, that has been listed on microsoft, and other forums... > >but none of them are working. > > > >or do I have to create different images for different HAL configurations? > > > > > >thanks in advanced, > >Peter > > |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just add an autologon and a automatic reboot...
regards Johan Arwidmark Microsoft MVP - Setup/Deployment On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 06:10:04 -0800, Peter Lawlor <PeterLawlor@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: >Oh, thanks alot. >that worked, APART from one tiny little thing. > >I have to log in, as admin so it would install the multiprocessor >configuration, then restart the computer... > >I really hope i dont have to do this, to each computer... >(I know I dont have 20k computers, but I work in a department, within the >unversity of sheffield in UK, and having 200+ computers) > >thanks >Peter Lawlor > >"Johan Arwidmark" wrote: > >> Switching HALs is really not supported by Microsoft, however a few >> customer are doing this and it works well as long as you have controll >> of which hardware you purchase...(some hardware just doesnt work well >> with HAL replacments routines, but most hardware do) >> >> The procedure I've seen customers doing is to create their master >> image of a ACPI Uniprocessor machine and use that image on >> Multiprocessor machines as well. >> >> The line in sysprep.inf looks like this: >> UpdateUPHAL="ACPIAPIC_MP,C:\windows\Inf\Hal.inf" >> >> I know of a customer in Sweden that has about 20 000 computers, and >> one single image (Which I think is so cool) and they use the above >> procedure. >> >> >> regards >> >> Johan Arwidmark >> Microsoft MVP - Setup/Deployment >> >> >> >> On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 03:46:08 -0800, Peter Lawlor >> <PeterLawlor@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: >> >> >Hi, >> > >> >if I install an XP on a Multiprocessor machine (that has HT), and take a >> >image, could I use the same image on other types of computers, e.g. >> >processors that aren't HT? >> > >> >so it would auto install the correct HAL for that type of computer? >> > >> >I tried a few things, that has been listed on microsoft, and other forums... >> >but none of them are working. >> > >> >or do I have to create different images for different HAL configurations? >> > >> > >> >thanks in advanced, >> >Peter >> >> |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oooooh, thanks Johan :-)
"Johan Arwidmark" wrote: > Just add an autologon and a automatic reboot... > > > regards > > Johan Arwidmark > Microsoft MVP - Setup/Deployment > > > On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 06:10:04 -0800, Peter Lawlor > <PeterLawlor@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > > >Oh, thanks alot. > >that worked, APART from one tiny little thing. > > > >I have to log in, as admin so it would install the multiprocessor > >configuration, then restart the computer... > > > >I really hope i dont have to do this, to each computer... > >(I know I dont have 20k computers, but I work in a department, within the > >unversity of sheffield in UK, and having 200+ computers) > > > >thanks > >Peter Lawlor > > > >"Johan Arwidmark" wrote: > > > >> Switching HALs is really not supported by Microsoft, however a few > >> customer are doing this and it works well as long as you have controll > >> of which hardware you purchase...(some hardware just doesnt work well > >> with HAL replacments routines, but most hardware do) > >> > >> The procedure I've seen customers doing is to create their master > >> image of a ACPI Uniprocessor machine and use that image on > >> Multiprocessor machines as well. > >> > >> The line in sysprep.inf looks like this: > >> UpdateUPHAL="ACPIAPIC_MP,C:\windows\Inf\Hal.inf" > >> > >> I know of a customer in Sweden that has about 20 000 computers, and > >> one single image (Which I think is so cool) and they use the above > >> procedure. > >> > >> > >> regards > >> > >> Johan Arwidmark > >> Microsoft MVP - Setup/Deployment > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 03:46:08 -0800, Peter Lawlor > >> <PeterLawlor@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > >> > >> >Hi, > >> > > >> >if I install an XP on a Multiprocessor machine (that has HT), and take a > >> >image, could I use the same image on other types of computers, e.g. > >> >processors that aren't HT? > >> > > >> >so it would auto install the correct HAL for that type of computer? > >> > > >> >I tried a few things, that has been listed on microsoft, and other forums... > >> >but none of them are working. > >> > > >> >or do I have to create different images for different HAL configurations? > >> > > >> > > >> >thanks in advanced, > >> >Peter > >> > >> > > |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Alright nevermind,
I had a bug in my sysprep, which didn't install the ACPI MultiProcessor properly, do i didn't need to login. But... I noticed, when I take an image from the uniprocessor machine, and clone all the other machines, then all the machines are multiprocessor configured, when they aren't even HT capable. Is it possible to add both ACPIAPIC_UP and ACPIAPIC_MP to the sysprep, so it can detect and install the correct ACPI for the processor? "Peter Lawlor" wrote: > Oooooh, thanks Johan :-) > > "Johan Arwidmark" wrote: > > > Just add an autologon and a automatic reboot... > > > > > > regards > > > > Johan Arwidmark > > Microsoft MVP - Setup/Deployment > |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
How did you get on?
"Peter Lawlor" <PeterLawlor@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:126E1E1B-197D-4BDC-9FCD-064C1050E1F2@microsoft.com... > Alright nevermind, > I had a bug in my sysprep, which didn't install the ACPI MultiProcessor > properly, do i didn't need to login. > > But... > I noticed, when I take an image from the uniprocessor machine, and clone > all > the other machines, then all the machines are multiprocessor configured, > when > they aren't even HT capable. > > Is it possible to add both ACPIAPIC_UP and ACPIAPIC_MP to the sysprep, so > it > can detect and install the correct ACPI for the processor? > > "Peter Lawlor" wrote: > >> Oooooh, thanks Johan :-) >> >> "Johan Arwidmark" wrote: >> >> > Just add an autologon and a automatic reboot... >> > >> > >> > regards >> > >> > Johan Arwidmark >> > Microsoft MVP - Setup/Deployment >> |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi,
I just finally DID IT!. and it works perfectly, with just ONE thing. But I have 3 lines, i don't know if I need "UpdateUPHAL=Yes" or not. but using this "ForceHALDetection = Yes DriverSigningPolicy = Ignore" Will detect and install the "correct" HAL configuration. But when I found the ForceHALDetection" it said it's for Sysprep (Remote Installation Service) So I just thought I try it with ghost, and such, and cloned 4 different types of machines, and they all appeared to have the correct Hal configuration. I had to out in "Driving Signing Poilcy" because for the UniProcessor, XP installation was complaining that the driver wasn't signed. Well, It did in the past with the other sysprep file, but i dont know about this type. but oh well. It works. Peter Lawlor "SameOld" wrote: > How did you get on? > > "Peter Lawlor" <PeterLawlor@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:126E1E1B-197D-4BDC-9FCD-064C1050E1F2@microsoft.com... > > Alright nevermind, > > I had a bug in my sysprep, which didn't install the ACPI MultiProcessor > > properly, do i didn't need to login. > > > > But... > > I noticed, when I take an image from the uniprocessor machine, and clone > > all > > the other machines, then all the machines are multiprocessor configured, > > when > > they aren't even HT capable. > > > > Is it possible to add both ACPIAPIC_UP and ACPIAPIC_MP to the sysprep, so > > it > > can detect and install the correct ACPI for the processor? > > > > "Peter Lawlor" wrote: > > > >> Oooooh, thanks Johan :-) > >> > >> "Johan Arwidmark" wrote: > >> > >> > Just add an autologon and a automatic reboot... > >> > > >> > > >> > regards > >> > > >> > Johan Arwidmark > >> > Microsoft MVP - Setup/Deployment > >> > > > |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sysprep V2 vs Sysprep V1 for XP | madsdad | Windows XP Setup Deployment | 1 | 01-05-2006 06:26 AM |
| Sysprep Hangs during PNP Monitor installation, reboot fixes it. ZTI Process | Jryde21 (JWR) | Windows XP Setup Deployment | 2 | 01-05-2006 06:20 AM |
| Running Sysprep The 2nd Time on a Computer | BC | Windows XP Setup Deployment | 0 | 01-05-2006 06:14 AM |
| Sysprep 2.0 & XP SP2 - Failed to Update Registry | Kenny | Windows XP Setup Deployment | 4 | 01-05-2006 06:10 AM |
| Sysprep Problems with XP? | JMcCLainMI | Windows XP Setup Deployment | 0 | 01-05-2006 06:10 AM |