|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi,
I need a new budget AGP8 graphic card, as I have an unreliable Matrox 450 in PCI slot at the moment. Have TFT 17" capable of 1280x1024 at 75Hz with DVI but would like to budget for 1600*1200 as that would be the next step up. Another future feature would be TV and HDTV outputs but not as a priority. I don’t need dual monitors that badly any more. I usually do Photoshop editing and DVD editing and DVD playing. I don’t do games apart from some basic ones. I value reliability more than performance. Last year card will do if reckoned trouble-free. The budget is up to Ł100 ($150). Why ask and not Google? I did Google but all reviews and usenet articles I have seen so far were written from gamers point of view. The system is P4 2.5G, Asus P4P800-E mobo, 1 Gb memory. Nothing is overclocked but it could be if needed. I use Zalman’s Reserator 1, silent water cooling system for CPU cooling (excellent!). They have optional cooler bit for graphic card processors, it would be bonus if it can be used with the new video card. I would value your opinions and experiences. Thanks ayosha PS I see often similar card with 64, 128 or 256 MB, would more memory make any difference for me? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Typically all you'll usually find are cards for gaming,but thats ok
too,gamers are fairly demanding.A descent card that offers most options is the ATI all in wonder-PCI or AGP.The card has more features than 95% of them,it runs under 150.00 "nononono" wrote: > Hi, > > I need a new budget AGP8 graphic card, as I have an unreliable > Matrox 450 in PCI slot at the moment. > > Have TFT 17" capable of 1280x1024 at 75Hz with DVI but would > like to budget for 1600*1200 as that would be the next step up. > Another future feature would be TV and HDTV outputs but not as > a priority. I don’t need dual monitors that badly any more. > > I usually do Photoshop editing and DVD editing and DVD playing. > I don’t do games apart from some basic ones. I value > reliability more than performance. Last year card will do if > reckoned trouble-free. The budget is up to £100 ($150). > > Why ask and not Google? I did Google but all reviews and usenet > articles I have seen so far were written from gamers point of > view. > > The system is P4 2.5G, Asus P4P800-E mobo, 1 Gb memory. Nothing > is overclocked but it could be if needed. > > I use Zalman’s Reserator 1, silent water cooling system for CPU > cooling (excellent!). They have optional cooler bit for graphic > card processors, it would be bonus if it can be used with the > new video card. > > I would value your opinions and experiences. > > Thanks > ayosha > > PS I see often similar card with 64, 128 or 256 MB, would more > memory make any difference for me? > > |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks,
In the meantime I found a couple of informative sites that would benefit others in the same situation, so there they are: http://graphics.tomshardware.com/gra...110/index.html and http://graphics.tomshardware.com/gra...302/index.html Unfortunately nothing about reliability. Another rumour I heard on the web is about bad drivers support from ATI as compared to nVidia, but that could be only the usual bitching between those two camps. Any input about that anybody? But please not the usual war. Your opinions are more than welcome, thanks. a > Typically all you'll usually find are cards for > gaming,but thats ok > too,gamers > are fairly demanding.A descent card that offers most > options is the ATI all in wonder-PCI or AGP.The card has > more features than 95% of them,it runs under 150.00 > > "nononono" wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I need a new budget AGP8 graphic card, as I have an >> unreliable Matrox 450 in PCI slot at the moment. >> >> Have TFT 17" capable of 1280x1024 at 75Hz with DVI but >> would like to budget for 1600*1200 as that would be the >> next step up. Another future feature would be TV and HDTV >> outputs but not as a priority. I don’t need dual >> monitors that badly any more. >> >> I usually do Photoshop editing and DVD editing and DVD >> playing. I don’t do games apart from some basic ones. I >> value reliability more than performance. Last year card >> will do if reckoned trouble-free. The budget is up to >> £100 ($150). >> >> Why ask and not Google? I did Google but all reviews and >> usenet articles I have seen so far were written from >> gamers point of view. >> >> The system is P4 2.5G, Asus P4P800-E mobo, 1 Gb memory. >> Nothing is overclocked but it could be if needed. >> >> I use Zalman’s Reserator 1, silent water cooling system >> for CPU cooling (excellent!). They have optional cooler >> bit for graphic card processors, it would be bonus if it >> can be used with the new video card. >> >> I would value your opinions and experiences. >> >> Thanks >> ayosha >> >> PS I see often similar card with 64, 128 or 256 MB, would >> more memory make any difference for me? >> >> > |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Portable Media Device | Arkay | Windows XP Photos | 4 | 01-05-2006 07:11 AM |
| Computer no longer recognizes Camera | tkb | Windows XP Photos | 8 | 01-05-2006 07:11 AM |
| canon camera A520 cannot upload images to computer | foobalkif4 | Windows XP Photos | 9 | 01-05-2006 07:11 AM |
| AutoPlay Wizard no Longer Starting | flyers319 | Windows XP Photos | 3 | 01-05-2006 07:10 AM |
| Camera and Scanner wizard doesn't work | Striped | Windows XP Photos | 1 | 01-05-2006 07:07 AM |