|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm glad the problem is gone.
The interlace vs. non interlace issue was one that was most prevalent at the 800x600 resolution and analog monitors of old design or limited screen size. A 10" monitor falls into one and possibly both. Another possible issue had to do with the video card output signals and timing. I'm not sure how to explain this, but some displays can "talk" digitally to the video card and it's drivers. This can cause the video card to setup/tweak timing to match the display. If an incompatable timing was setup, this might explain some of your problems and results. If the display uses an older setup scheme, such as an .inf file, the tweaking is generally done within it. "emil_lam" <Emil_Lam@mailcity.com> wrote in message news:1133515237.003354.301890@g43g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com... > But I've no idea of how to change the interlace setting unless the > video cards do it automatically for me. > > Anyway, after changing the resolution, more icons & window content > could be displayed on screen compared with 640x480. Image was clear & > I'm happy with that. > |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
"emil_lam" <Emil_Lam@mailcity.com> wrote in message news:1133515237.003354.301890@g43g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com... > But I've no idea of how to change the interlace setting unless the > video cards do it automatically for me. > > Anyway, after changing the resolution, more icons & window content > could be displayed on screen compared with 640x480. Image was clear & > I'm happy with that. > Probably the monitor worked at 800 by 600 56 Hz refresh - that was a common refresh rate when Win95/98 was around. Also sounds like the monitor does not have "plug-n-play" (EDID) capability, so you have to set it manually. Try setting refresh to 56 Hz. 'Course it will have some flicker, but that's the price of using the old cheapie.... NGA |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not Gimpy Anymore 寫道: > > Probably the monitor worked at 800 by 600 56 Hz refresh - that was a > common refresh rate when Win95/98 was around. Also sounds like the > monitor does not have "plug-n-play" (EDID) capability, so you have to > set it manually. Try setting refresh to 56 Hz. 'Course it will have some > flicker, but that's the price of using the old cheapie.... > > NGA Fuzzy and ghosty screen images will still appear after every PC boot after XP Home entered graphics mode (after XP Home logo loaded). But I found that if I turned off power of monitor then turned it on after a while, the screen display could change back normal. Now whenever I boot this PC I will turned off the monitor just after XP Home logo appeared then turned it on again after a while. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to stop MS Paint changing resolution of files to 96 dpi? | Dmitry Kopnichev | Windows XP Print Fax | 34 | 01-05-2006 06:41 AM |
| One-way connection: networked XP/2000 PC's | Cheryl | Windows XP Network Web | 22 | 01-05-2006 04:11 AM |
| Can't Ping My Own IP Address - Part 2 | Don | Windows XP Network Web | 3 | 01-05-2006 04:10 AM |
| my new monitor - a dell 1905 19" - has the images and text distort | Russ | Windows XP Hardware | 7 | 01-05-2006 02:20 AM |
| Re: Icons have bad resolution | mijcar | Windows XP Basics | 0 | 01-05-2006 02:04 AM |