|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
My remote users have always used the default Windows XP VPN client to connect
to the office network via Windows 2003 VPN. Last week, we installed & configured a Watchguard Firebox X500 w/ MUVPN (Mobile User VPN). I want to continue to use the default XP VPN and not have to deploy a third party VPN client to my remote XP users. I'm able to successfully establish VPN connectivity and remotely administer the server via Remote Desktop Connection (which is all I really need). Some of my clients however, are telling me that working via remote destop has become painfully slow I'm thinking that once successful connectivity is established, the actual VPN client used makes little or no difference. Others are suggesting we reconfigure all mobile users' laptops to use a Watchguard VPN client. Is anyone here succesfully using the default Windows XP VPN client to access a network behind a Firebox? ???? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Changing Window & Button to XP style | Phil Wright | Windows XP Customize | 1 | 01-05-2006 06:29 AM |
| Are security updates available for saving to CD | Ian Ferrin | Windows XP Setup Deployment | 3 | 01-05-2006 06:22 AM |
| computer owner? | harry | Windows XP Security Admin | 1 | 01-05-2006 05:07 AM |
| Is Windows xp sp2 Firewall good enough? | Jeff | Windows XP Security Admin | 5 | 01-05-2006 04:27 AM |
| Windows XP and Ram | Dan | Windows XP New Users | 10 | 01-05-2006 03:56 AM |